Dual Anonymous Proposals Guide for Reviewers

Dual-Anonymous Proposal Review. Aida Ahmadi. (on behalf of the Allegro ... – Section 5.2 of the Cycle 8 Proposer's Guide. 2 https://almascience.eso.org ...

Dual-Anonymous Guidelines for e- MERLIN proposal preparation ...

This means that the principal investigator (and more in general the proposing team) does not know who the reviewer/s will be, while the reviewers are provided ...

In what ways do authors of an anonymous paper reveal themselves ...

... Handbook plus 52 papers by the sole author. Hard to hide that one ... reviewer to identify me as the author during a double-blind review.

Implementation of Dual-Anonymous Peer Review at NASA

... guidance in this talk. Topics that will be covered include: how to write anonymized proposals, how proposals will be evaluated, and which additional ...

NASA Proposals ToolKit - LPL Intranet

Dual-anonymous peer review means that the reviewers are unaware of the identities of the proposers, and vice versa, to ensure an unbiased review process. For ...

Proposal Guidance | Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory

For calls with dual anonymous peer review, the entire Project Description must be anonymized by the submitter. Suggested word counts are provided below. Authors ...

The Value of a Dual Anonymous System for Reducing Bias in ...

Changes in the instructions to reviewers: Panelists were reminded that ... proposals worse under reviewer anonymous than they did under the dual anonymous.

Chapter II: Proposal Preparation Instructions | NSF

Brevity will assist reviewers and Foundation staff in dealing effectively with proposals. Therefore, the Project Description (including Results from Prior NSF ...

Proposal Review - LMT - Large Millimeter Telescope Alfonso Serrano

Additionally, the review process will be dual anonymous to ensure a fair and unbiased assessment of all proposals. For more information on how this will be ...

NSF NOIRLab Call for Standard Proposals: Semester 2025A

- Dual Anonymous 2-stage Review. Semester 2025A continues the Dual Anonymous Review Process (DARP), which began in 2022B, for all observing proposals submitted ...

Submission Guidance | Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center

Expansion of Dual-Anonymous Peer Review (DAPR): In 2022, the following ROSES ... 1) No Due Date (NoDD) programs that will review proposals with a ...

April 2024 Call for Proposals - Gemini Observatory |

Since Feb 2021, we have been using a dual anonymous review process. New proposal templates for FT have been updated. DARP compliance is ...

What we can learn from NASA's Dual-Anonymous Peer Review

Similar to other grant production/submission guides ... Concurrently, NASA was applying dual-anonymous peer review to proposals for telescope time ...

View Grant Opportunity - Search Results Detail | Grants.gov

... proposal. Proposals will, unless otherwise specified, be reviewed using a dual-anonymous peer review (DAPR) process in which the identity of reviewers will ...

How to submit your proposal via the webform

The subsections with (*) will be hidden from reviewers. For other subsections, please follows the Dual Anonymous (DA) writing style described in Section 3. For ...

Proposal Evaluation Process - LNLS - CNPEM

The LNLS proposal evaluation process is based on a distributed double-anonymous (DDA) system, which consists of peer–review where reviewers are unaware of ...

Dual-Anonymous Peer Review Town Hall for Planetary ... - YouTube

... of the motivation for dual-anonymous peer review, guidance on how to prepare anonymized proposals, and the process of anonymized reviews.

Avoiding Non-Compliant Dual Anonymous Proposals in Cycle 25 ...

The Chandra peer review is a dual-anonymous format and proposers must anonymize the text of their Scientific Justification.

Proposal Guidelines - USJF - US-Japan Foundation

The proposal may be single or double-spaced. Proposals are circulated among the USJF staff and occasionally to anonymous outside reviewers and titled experts.

A Guide to Peer Reviewing Book Proposals

The vast majority of book reviews are conducted in this manner. 2. Double-blind peer review: Neither author nor reviewers know the identity of the other. 3.