The Confederacy Wasn't About Slavery?

The Reasons for Secession: A Documentary Study in the Civil War

Many maintain that the primary cause of the war was the Southern states' desire to preserve the institution of slavery.

Was the Civil War Only About Slavery? - The Imaginative Conservative

In It Wasn't About Slavery: Exposing the Great Lie of the Civil War, Samuel W. Mitcham, Jr., critiques both assumptions—especially the latter.

The Civil War Wasn't America's Only War Involving Slavery | TIME

The Civil War was the culmination of a failed racial policy that was stillborn in 1619 when the first Africans were brought to Virginia and sold to the highest ...

Still think the Civil War wasn't fought over slavery? The Confederate ...

Was the Civil War fought over slavery or states' rights? People love to debate this question, and many seem to believe it's a matter of opinion.

Was the Civil War About Slavery? | 5 Minute Video - YouTube

... slaves over whom they had total control. And it wasn't just plantation owners who supported slavery. The slave society was embraced by all ...

The South still lies about the Civil War - Salon.com

In an ongoing revisionist history effort, Southern schools and churches still pretend the war wasn't about slavery.

If the U.S. Civil War wasn't about slavery, then why did 8 of the ...

Someone is being less than honest here. · Only four CSA states made declarations of secession, and only two mentioned slavery as a reason. · The ...

Would the Civil War still happened if slavery wasn't an issue?

By 1860 the only issues that caused regional tension to any real degree were those associated with slavery. So, NO. Without slavery there would ...

The Civil War - PBS

The Republican party had run on an anti-slavery platform, and many southerners felt that there was no longer a place for them in the Union. On December 20, 1860 ...

Was the Civil War a Terrible Mistake? - Cato Institute

Reliance on the use of force resulted in the emancipation of American slaves, obviously a good thing. But this, the military strategy for ...

Primary Sources: Slavery as the Cause of the Civil War

Beyond these documents, one can also find explicit mentions of slavery in the Confederate Constitution. While slavery comes up in a number of ...

Five myths about why the South seceded - The Washington Post

In fact, Confederates opposed states' rights — that is, the right of Northern states not to support slavery. Story continues below advertisement.

Debunking the myth of the Lost Cause: A lie embedded in American ...

According to him, the Confederacy wasn't defending slavery, it was defending each state's right to choose whether or not to allow slavery.

How Should the Confederacy be Remembered? | Page 43

The Confederacy should be remembered as a democratic nation that allowed slavery but that began to move toward emancipation shortly before ...

How long would it take for the Confederates to abolish slavery if they ...

The Confederate Constitution protected slavery as an institution more than the US Constitution did. Article IV prevented individual States from ...

A former Confederate officer on slavery and the Civil War, 1907

If it was right to own slaves as property it was right to fight for it. The South went to war on account of Slavery. South Carolina went to war – as she said in ...

Could Compromise Have Prevented the Civil War? | HISTORY

Southern states would not have ratified an abolitionist Constitution. Nor did Northerners—including those who personally opposed slavery—call ...

The Civil War was About Slavery - Fact or Myth?

The Civil war was about slavery, but it wasn't "just about slavery". Sectionalism, Protectionism, and States' Rights were also factors.

For the last time, the American Civil War was not about states' rights

Likewise, there were men who fought for the Confederacy that never owned slaves (the vast majority, in fact), who didn't wish to, and who ...

Slavery, Not States' Rights, Caused Civil War Whose Political Effects ...

Slavery was the Civil War's cause despite revisionists saying otherwise. Historian Adam Goodheart, who has a new book on the critical year ...