Evolutionary Biologist Reacts to Creationist Arguments
Creationist Makes Terrible Arguments on JRE (A Response)
... claims about evolutionary biology and religious psychology. Jon Perry of Stated Clearly joins me to respond to Meyer's claims. Listen to my ...
Scientific American: 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense [Debunked]
Disagreements among even evolutionary biologists show how little science supports evolution. If humans descended from monkeys, why are there ...
Twelve Creationism, intelligent design, and modern biology
In one of his most popular and influential lectures, “The Menace of Darwinism,” he summed up his case against evolution, arguing that it was both un-Christian ...
Arguments against Creationism and Intelligent Design FAQs
A number of creationists have stated that evolutionary theory leads logically to racism. This brief article discusses aspects of leading ICR creationist Henry ...
HOW SCIENCE RESPONDS WHEN CREATIONISTS CRITICIZE ...
There is a well accepted, solidly established body of evidence showing that evolution is real and, although knowledge of some mechanisms is ...
Refuting Evolution 2 chapter 4: Argument: Natural selection leads to ...
But no reputable creationist denies speciation—in fact, it is an important part of creationist biology. In the previous chapter, I showed that the real issue is ...
Evolution/Creation - James M Tour Group
I am not. I do not know how to use science to prove intelligent design although some others might. I am sympathetic to the arguments and I find some of them ...
Intelligent Design versus Evolution - PMC - PubMed Central
Behe claimed to have discovered an ironclad proof for the existence of a supernatural being, whom he called the “Intelligent Designer.” His studies of the ...
The Scientific Case Against Evolution
Creationists also would anticipate that any "vertical changes" in organized complexity would be downward, since the Creator (by definition) would create things ...
Argumentation and fallacies in creationist writings against ...
While the fallacious arguments are irrelevant when discussing evolutionary theory from the scientific point of view, they can be effective for ...
Why I Became a Creationist / OrthoChristian.Com
I believed (and still believe) that many popular creationist arguments against Darwinism were based on simple misunderstandings of the ...
The value of “stridency”: a creationist becomes a biologist
I find it confusing that evolution is seen as contrary to faith. I read the letter and had a similar experience. i.e. I was raised a young earth ...
Evolution Justice League Responds to Creationist Trolls - YouTube
If you've been following my series debunking Discovery Institute, the Christian propaganda mill, you know about Gunter Bechly.
Creation–Evolution Controversy - Scholarly Community Encyclopedia
The debate is religious, not scientific: in the scientific community, evolution is accepted as fact and efforts to sustain the traditional view ...
Irreducible complexity - Wikipedia
Behe introduced the expression irreducible complexity along with a full account of his arguments in his 1996 book Darwin's Black Box, and he said it made ...
Creationists Have Questions. I Have Answers. - Mother Jones
First, creationism and the Bible aren't theories. Second, evolution is a fact and a theory. If this question is an argument to allow creationism ...
How to Debate a Young Earth Creationist - Skeptoid Podcast
In fact, evolution could be very easily falsified. Evolutionary biologist JBS Haldane famously said that a fossilized rabbit from the ...
Creationism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The Creationists seized on this and argued that they had the best authority to reject evolution, or at least to judge it no more of a science ...
Confessions of a former creationist | Trees In Space
I used to be a creationist. I have no qualms about admitting this now, despite being an established academic ecologist. I teach evolution at ...
Evolution Defended - Geoscience Research Institute
The third creationist argument against evolution is that it is not well- supported by the evidence. Two principal criticisms are involved here.