Justices weigh rules for when public officials can block critics on ...

Section VII- Proving Discrimination- Disparate Impact

2d at 617–18 (where public officials made a choice to close one of 17 ... These requirements can affect the legal framework by requiring recipients to ...

Supreme Court Issues New Test for State Action Liability of Public ...

The unanimous decision in Lindke v. Freed marks a new weigh-in by the Supreme Court on what state officials can do on their social media accounts.

Supreme Court to decide if government officials can block social ...

Appeals courts have set forth different tests for determining whether blocking a social media user from commenting on a government official's ...

Public Officials' Use of Social Media May Trigger First Amendment ...

Both cases focused on whether an official's blocking of comments or responses to such communications constitutes censorship in violation of the ...

Justices Weigh Whether Politicians Can Block Critics - Political Wire

“The Supreme Court is delving into a legal issue left unresolved when then-President Donald Trump prevented critics from following his posts ...

First Amendment Handbook | RCFP Newsgathering Guide

The Supreme Court reviewed the case and held that police officers could be liable for bringing the media inside a home, but the Court declined to rule on the ...

Supreme Court Term Ends with Win for Trump, First Amendment ...

The case establishes that, while government officials are free to express their views, they may not use their official authority to coerce ...

The Imperial Supreme Court | Harvard Law Review

A Congress that wants to address this problem has several options available to it. It could directly overrule some of the Court's invented ...

Top 10 First Amendment Cases of the Supreme Court Term

Justice Breyer concurred but favored a balancing test weighing a regulation's “First Amendment harms against the regulatory objectives that it ...

Supreme Court: Updates on oral arguments in social media case

Fletcher told the justices the government may not use coercive threats to suppress speech, but can inform, persuade and criticize private ...

Blocked in the Digital Age - State Bar of Texas | Articles

As far as the blocking of critics by Trump, the court was decisive in its constitutional analysis. ... The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has also ...

Supreme Court allows White House to press social media ... - CNN

“The government can press third parties to silence you, but the Supreme Court will not find you have standing to complain about it absent ...

Supreme Court sidesteps major social media issues - The Hill

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court ruled that public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media, while ...

19-1392 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (06/24/2022)

thority to judge what the law means and how it should ap- ply to the ... within “the reach of majorities and [government] officials.

Supreme Court to decide if officials can block critics on social media

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to decide whether elected officials violate the First Amendment when they block people from ...

Supreme Court to weigh government role in online misinformation

The 5th Circuit issued an injunction that, if allowed to go into effect, would block government agencies from engaging in “coercion” or “ ...

What Matters Most in the Supreme Court's Upcoming Social Media ...

The plaintiffs in both cases argue their First Amendment rights were violated when public officials blocked them based on their viewpoints, but ...

Supreme Court looks to thread the needle on public, private social ...

The Supreme Court will have to decide where to draw the line between public and private accounts for government officials.

Libel and Slander | The First Amendment Encyclopedia

Libel and slander lawsuits can have a chilling effect on free speech. The First Amendment rights of free speech and free press often clash ...

Particular Governmental Regulations that Restrict Expression

The Court's opinion, by Justice Reed, recognized that the restrictions of political activities imposed by the Act did in some measure impair First Amendment and ...