- BRADLEY v. APPALACHIAN POWER CO🔍
- Single|Firm Conduct Under Section 2 Of The Sherman Act 🔍
- APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY v. Public Service Electric & Gas ...🔍
- Eldridge v. Howard🔍
- Congressional Court Watcher🔍
- Former Ohio Supreme Court justices lead redistricting reform effort ...🔍
- Appalachian Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency🔍
- Why the U.S. Supreme Court has nine justices🔍
State Justices Issue Split Ruling In Appalachian Power Case
BRADLEY v. APPALACHIAN POWER CO | 163 W. Va. 332 | Law
Get free access to the complete judgment in BRADLEY v. APPALACHIAN POWER CO on CaseMine.
Single-Firm Conduct Under Section 2 Of The Sherman Act : Chapter 1
Section 2 establishes three offenses, commonly termed "monopolization," "attempted monopolization," and "conspiracy to monopolize."
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY v. Public Service Electric & Gas ...
United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent, ...
Eldridge v. Howard - Harvard Law Review |
The Ninth Circuit ruled that the DC Superior Court is not a “State court” under 28 USC § 2253(c)(1)(A), which details when a certificate of appealability (COA) ...
Congressional Court Watcher: Recent Appellate Decisions of ...
January 16, 2024. The federal courts issue hundreds of decisions every week in cases involving diverse legal disputes. This.
Former Ohio Supreme Court justices lead redistricting reform effort ...
Two former Ohio Supreme Court justices — one Republican and one Democrat — have joined together to fight for anti-gerrymandering reform that ...
Appalachian Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency
The case: In 1998, the EPA issued a guidance document that made changes to state sufficiency reviews and emission monitoring regulations.
Why the U.S. Supreme Court has nine justices - National Geographic
Nine justices make up the US Supreme Court: one chief justice and eight associate justices. But it hasn't always been this way.
142 (1924); Comment, Federal Power. Act—Jurisdiction and Functions of the Federal Power Commission, 39 MICH. L. REV. 976. (1941). 2. Congress originally passed ...
Gerrymandering, Supreme Court Inaction, and Legislative Failures
By Tyler Melton. This note looks at the issue of political gerrymandering, with a focus on three states where the Supreme Court has declined ...
News. Gov. Justice appoints First Lady Cathy Justice to State Board of Education 11/07/2024 .
How public interest technology erased 21,000 wrongful convictions at once. When the ACLU of Massachusetts joined with a public interest technologist, ...
Joel B. Eisen - Environmental Studies - University of Richmond
Supreme Court set to hear state-federal power market jurisdiction case (Utility Dive) Wed., Feb. 24, 2016. Supreme Court to assess if FERC preempts subsidy ...
Justices' Trump Ballot Ruling May Spark Constitutional Crisis
On March 4, the US Supreme Court ruled in Anderson v. Trump that former President Donald Trump is required to be reinstated to the ballot in Colorado.
The EPA's Good Neighbor Plan: Defending Public Health in the ...
Industrial polluters and their political allies asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block the Good Neighbor Plan, a regulation issued by the ...
Energy sector braces for Supreme Court NEPA case - E&E News
A new Supreme Court case is seeking to limit federal environmental reviews for energy infrastructure projects — throwing the spotlight on ...
September 2023 Updates to the Climate Case Charts
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation.
Appalachian Power to face new regulatory system - Virginia Mercury
Beginning this July, state regulators will review Appalachian Power Company's rates and earnings every two years, following legislation that significantly ...
U.S. Supreme Court Rules on the “Sequel to Citizens United”
“Taken together with Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, today's decision eviscerates our Nation's campaign finance laws, leaving a ...
APPALACHIAN COALS, Inc., et al. v. UNITED STATES.
This suit was brought to enjoin a combination alleged to be in restraint of interstate commerce in bituminous coal and in attempted monopolization of part of ...