- The California Supreme Court Clarifies Suitable Seating🔍
- The Supreme Court Clarifies the Cause of Action for Negligent ...🔍
- The California Supreme Court Further Clarifies the Definition of ...🔍
- California Supreme Court Clarifies California's Seventh Day Rest ...🔍
- California Supreme Court Holds That Employers Have A Good|Faith ...🔍
- California Supreme Court Clarifies The Scope Of "Hours Worked ...🔍
- U.S. SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION ...🔍
- Groff v. DeJoy🔍
California Supreme Court clarifies employer responsibilities on ...
The California Supreme Court Clarifies Suitable Seating - Kby Law
Instead, the Court concluded that the correct analysis was one that considered an “employee's actual or expected tasks” by location—according to the Court, ...
The Supreme Court Clarifies the Cause of Action for Negligent ...
If you litigate cases against public entities, here is some good news for you: The California Supreme Court has finally brought some clarity to claims for ...
The California Supreme Court Further Clarifies the Definition of ...
Employees were “required to wait for and undergo the exit security procedure before leaving” the work premises. · Employees remained confined to ...
California Supreme Court Clarifies California's Seventh Day Rest ...
In addition, Labor Code Section 510 requires employers to pay employees time and one-half for the first eight hours on the seventh consecutive ...
California Supreme Court Holds That Employers Have A Good-Faith ...
The California Supreme Court held today that an employer is not subject to statutory penalties for providing incomplete or inaccurate wage statements.
California Supreme Court Clarifies The Scope Of "Hours Worked ...
16? The Court held that an employee's time spent on an employer's premises awaiting and undergoing an employer-mandated exit procedure that ...
U.S. SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires employers to accommodate the religious practices of their employees, unless doing so would impose an ...
Groff v. DeJoy: Supreme Court Clarifies Employment Protections for ...
The Court also clarified that employers may take into account the burdens an accommodation imposes on other employees, as long as those burdens ...
California Supreme Court Clarifies the Single Use of a Racial Slur ...
Under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ('FEHA”), unlawful harassment is “unwanted and unwelcome” conduct based on a protected ...
Dynamex v. Superior Court: California Supreme Court Clarifies ...
v. Superior Court, clarifying the standard that applies to determine whether a worker is properly classified as an independent contractor for ...
The California Supreme Court Clarifies California's "Kin Care" Law
The Court specifically held that the statue does not apply to policies that provide for an uncapped number of compensated sick days. Employers ...
However, the trial court rejected the employer's evidence and relied instead on testimony of the two named plaintiffs and 20 randomly selected class members.
California Supreme Court Says Employers Not Liable for COVID-19 ...
Last week, the California Supreme Court responded to a request from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to clarify whether an employer can be ...
U.S. Supreme Court clarifies standard for job transfer discrimination ...
The Court reasoned that employees must establish “some injury” with respect to the terms and conditions of employment, but that the plain ...
California Supreme Court Clarifies Wage Statement Law: 2024
Spectrum Security Services determined that meal period premiums are considered wages. This means that employers must report these premiums on ...
Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for Showing Harm Under Title VII
On April 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court found that a Title VII plaintiff need only show they suffered “some harm” in an identifiable term ...
California Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of "Hours Worked ...
16? The Court held that an employee's time spent on an employer's premises awaiting and undergoing an employer-mandated exit procedure that ...
California Supreme Court Clarifies Day Of Rest Requirements
The California Supreme Court recently clarified the state's “day of rest” statutes, which should help California employers schedule their ...
California Supreme Court Clarifies - Newmeyer Dillion
In Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc., Case No. ... Employers with seasonal business fluctuations, which may result in employees working more than six ...
California Supreme Court Holds That Third-Party Agents of ...
California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (the FEHA) is a state anti-discrimination law. It protects California employees from ...