EU|JAPAN MUTUAL ADEQUACY DECISION

European Commission adopts adequacy decision on data flow with ...

This arrangement to establish a mutual data privacy framework complements the EU-Japan Economic. Partnership Agreement which entered into ...

Implementation of the Framework for Mutual and Smooth Transfer of ...

This means that, as a result of Japan receiving an Adequacy Decision, transfer of personal data from the EU to Japan became possible without requiring the ...

The European Union and Japan reach data transfer agreement - AKD

In this way, the mutual adequacy finding is set to enhance data transfers and commercial exchanges between the EU and Japan. This blog is ...

Adequacy of Switerland by the EU - admin.ch

The effect of an adequacy decision is that personal data can flow from the EU (and from Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland, which, as members of ...

ARTICLE - The Realization of Mutual Adequacy Recognition ...

The Board Members discussed the EU-Japan draft adequacy decision which they received from Commissioner Věra Jourová and have been asked to ...

The European Union and Japan agreed to create the world's largest ...

... adequacy decision on Japan. Věra Jourová, Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality: "Japan and EU are already strategic ...

Procedure Launched For Japan And The European Union ... - Mondaq

On 5 September 2018, the EU Commission commenced proceedings to adopt an Adequacy Decision in relation to Japan's protection of personal ...

EU and Japan issue joint statement on adequacy decision progress ...

In particular, the Commissioners highlighted that work is ongoing towards achieving mutual adequacy findings as soon as possible in 2018.

Japan GDPR adequacy - Aphaia

With a successful conclusion to their talks on reciprocal adequacy, the EU and Japan have agreed to recognise each other's data protection systems as ...

Data Protection - Significant developments on adequacy findings ...

These Guidelines form part of a broader effort to recognize “mutual adequacy” between the EU and Japan respectively under the incoming EU ...

The Post-Brexit Need for a Data Adequacy Decision to Engage in ...

Member states are free to conclude further bilateral arrangements. A key element of this mutual assistance is harmonised EU data protection laws ...

cross-border data - EU-Japan Centre

On 24 October, the EU and Japan will formally begin negotiations to include rules on cross-border data flows in the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement. The ...

Digital trade, data protection and EU adequacy decisions

We also find that countries that have an EU adequacy determination exhibit greater digital trade among each other, suggestive of a network or club effect.

Digital Trade, Data Protection and EU Adequacy Decisions | CITP

A positive adequacy evaluation by the Commission requires that the country has a regime that is 'essentially equivalent' to the European one.

Opinion 28/2018 regarding the European Commission Draft ...

decision for future adequacy applications. 42. The EU – Japan adequacy would also be the first mutual one. When and if the EU recognises Japan ...

Japan on Its Way to Data Protection Adequacy? - datenschutz notizen

It would therefore not be surprising to see a mutual recognition with Japan on the EU's adequacy list and the EU on Japans “white-list” of safe ...

Data transfers between the EU and Japan - LinkedIn

When the European Commission and Japan at 23 January 2019[1] both adopted adequacy decisions on Japan and the European Union, they created ...

Data transfers – what you need to know - Taylor Wessing

If the third country benefits from an EU adequacy decision, it is automatically considered to provide the right level of protection and you will ...

Transferring personal data to international organizations under the ...

For example, the mutual adequacy decision between Japan and the EU alone took 'repeated dialogue on some eighty occasions for a total of 300 ...

What are the possible implications for law enforcement exchanges?

The adequacy decision on Japan under the General Data Protection Regulation: What are the possible implications for law enforcement exchanges?