Events2Join

Fuel economy of 2.7 vs 3.5


3.0 duramax or 2.7 ecoboost - Boating and Fishing Forum

Then there is diesel cost, def, fuel filters,etc making the fuel mpg negligible.The 3.0's are no where near as fun to drive as the 2.7, really ...

Ford F-150 2.7 EcoBoost – MPG Test - YouTube

That's pretty pathetic. I've had the 3.5 ecoboost and 5.0 v8 4x4. Both of those easily got 23-26 on the highway going 75-80mph.

Why does my 2.7 L EcoBoost V6 in my F150 use more gas idling ...

I'm assuming that your F150 is fitted with a 3.5L Eco Boost V6: 375 HP engine? If so you should be able to better 20+mpg. If you are not, and ...

Gas Mileage - 2.7 vs. 3.5? - Charger Forums

The difference in gas consumption makes it worthwhile to get the 3.5L but even then the fuel savings isn't much that you may as well get the Hemi unless you do ...

Ford F-150 V8 vs EcoBoost Towing MPG Test for Fuel Economy

Hi pjmjunior, I used to have an ecoboost, but it was a 3.5, the larger of the two. Because of the towing numbers, I think most want the 3.5 ...

2.7 Vs 3.5 Ho | DodgeTalk Forum

The engine has to work a lot harder to push around that vehicle than the 3.5 would. I'd be willing to bet the fuel economy is about the same.

2.7 vs 3.5 ltr Eco-Boost F-150 | CattleToday.com

It got okay gas mileage poking around (15mpg), great gas mileage traveling unloaded at 55-60 mph (19-20mpg), and god-awful if pulling any weight ...

2024 Ford F-150 Prices, Reviews, and Pictures | Edmunds

Under the hood, the turbocharged 2.7 ... Fuel economy for the Ford F-150 ranges from 19 mpg combined with the 3.5-liter V6 to 23 mpg combined with RWD and the ...

Ford Ranger 2.7L EcoBoost V6 Outshines the 2.3L In Every Way But ...

The only drawback is fuel economy. If you drive carefully, you're looking to drop somewhere between 1-3 mpg versus the 2.3L. But if you tuck ...

2.3EB Vs 2.7 Vs 3.5 | 2015+ S550 Mustang Forum (GT, EcoBoost ...

The new 2.3L EcoBoost engine in the 2015 Ford Mustang packs very similar horsepower, gobs more torque and better fuel economy than the TiVCT 3.7 ...

Should You Buy The 2.7 Over The 3.5 EcoBoost Or 5.0 V8? - YouTube

It's my opinion it should be the base engine in the F-250, as it's towing fuel economy is roughly equal, or sometimes better than the 5.0l for ...

3.5 vs 2.7, which EcoBoost is better? - YouTube

Comments163 · 2.7 ECOBOOST - SECOND GEN - COOL FEATURES · 2.7 Ecoboost/3 years 47k · 2024 Ford F-150 2.7l vs 5.0l Coyote vs 3.5l Powerboost MPG ...

Best real-world MPG achieved? | Page 3 - Bronco6G

Stay out of the turbo. Put smaller tires on it. That's it, and it's. not going to amount to much. Perhaps the Bronco Sport or Toyota Land ...

2025 Ford Ranger Review, Pricing, and Specs - Car and Driver

A twin-turbocharged 2.7-liter V-6 comes on higher trims and makes 315 horsepower. ... The EPA estimates the four-cylinder Ranger's fuel economy at 21 mpg city and ...

Ford Gives Ranger an Engine Upgrade - Wards Auto

Ranger 2.7L V-6 3.jpg. Ford doesn't hide 2.7L turbo under plastic ... The uprated engine's combined fuel economy is 2 mpg (.87 km/L) ...

2025 Ford F-150® LARIAT® Truck | Model Details & Specs

... Fuel Tank, Transfer Case and Front Differential (4x4). Optional. Skid Plates - Heavy Duty, Front and Engine. Wheels & Tires. Standard. 275/60 R20 BSW All- ...

3.5 vs 2.7 towing a DUMP TRAILER which EcoBoost is better?

Comments32 · 2.7 Ecoboost gets AMAZING mpg while towing. · 3.5 vs 2.7, which EcoBoost is better? · 2.7 Ecoboost TOWING HEAVY · 2019 Ford F150 ...

Ford Tuning – HP Tuners

Broad EcoBoost coverage, including 2.3, 2.7, and 3.5L engines. Exclusive ECM ... and test your vehicle's fuel economy. Highway Fuel Economy (HWFE) ...

2025 Ford F-150 XLT Crew Cab Pickup For Sale Tampa FL

Fuel Economy | High to Low. Loading Vehicles. 2025 Oxford White Ford F-150 XLT ... 3.5-liter V-6 EcoBoost with Auto Stop-Start Technology: 400 horsepower ...

2025 Ford F-150® Platinum® Truck | Model Details & Specs

Delivering the benefits of both gas and electric power, the 3.5L PowerBoost V6 cranks out an impressive 430 horsepower and 570 lb.-ft. of torque.