The USPTO Speaks on Obviousness – Do Patent Practitioners Have ...

The National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP) is a nonprofit trade association for ... would have been obvious to one of ordinary ...

Non-obviousness in United States patent law - Wikipedia

An invention is not obvious if a "person having ordinary skill in the art" (PHOSITA) would not know how to solve the problem at which the invention is directed ...

Obvious Design Choice: Another Patent Examiner Catch-All

One particularly frustrating rejection that patent applicants can be faced with is a rejection alleging obviousness based on “design choice.

Insufficient Rationale for Rejection under 35 USC § 103

FoundPersuasive - Patent Prosecution Strategies and Templates for the Practical Practitioner. ... have been obvious. The Supreme Court in KSR noted that the ...

Top Tips for Overcoming Section 103 Obviousness Rejections by ...

application claims by a USPTO examiner. The principles apply in the context of IPRs and PGRs, because the claims do not have a presumption of validity. But ...

How to Prove Non-Obviousness in Examination - YouTube

Can your invention pass the non-obviousness test of patentability? This video explains how patent examiners determine whether your invention ...

'In re Cellect': How Patent Owners Can Protect Themselves From ...

In Cellect, the USPTO's failure to issue an obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) rejection during prosecution, combined with a grant of ...

The result of a combination is not a reason to combine - Mr. IP Law

Similarly, in patent law, an invention is deemed obvious if a hypothetical person skilled in the relevant field would have arrived at the same ...

2120-Rejection on Prior Art - USPTO

103, the reference teachings must somehow be modified in order to meet the claims. The modification must be one which would have been obvious to one of ordinary ...

Intellectual Property : Law360 : Legal News & Analysis

Legal news and analysis on patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets. Covers lawsuits, enforcement, ANDAs, Section 301, USPTO, legislation, regulation.

713-Interviews - USPTO

This eliminates the need to file, and have accepted, a power of attorney before having an interview. ... Design patent practitioners can only act as a ...

This Post Could Save Your Patent Law License - IPethics & INsights

Some patent attorneys and agents are under the impression that once they have passed the Patent Bar exam and have earned a PTO registration number, they are ...

What is the difference between a prima facie case of obviousness ...

But what exactly does it mean for an invention to be “obvious”? In patent law, obviousness is defined as the idea that if an invention would have been obvious ...

804-Definition of Double Patenting - USPTO

Specifically, the charts cover when two applications have claims to the same invention (Charts I-A) or to patentably indistinct inventions (Charts I-B) and when ...

Is 3D printing being held back by an invalid patent? - Hacker News

That is written by either the inventors or more likely the attorneys filing the application. The specification is not legally enforceable or ...

2163-Guidelines for the Examination of Patent Applications Under ...

To satisfy the written description requirement, a patent specification must describe the claimed invention in sufficient detail that one skilled in the art can ...

2104-Requirements of 35 U.S.C. 101 - USPTO

101 requires that whoever invents or discovers an eligible invention may obtain only ONE patent therefor. Thus, it prevents two patents issuing on the same ...

How Can the Updated USPTO Guidance on Determining ... - Mintz

Recent guidance published in the Federal Register by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) explains some of what is required ...

717-Prior Art Exceptions under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) and (2)

It does not mean that the applicant or patent owner is entitled as a matter of right to have the rejection of, or objection to, the claim(s) withdrawn. See ...

Patent FAQs - USPTO

Does an applicant have to file a petition for a license with a new patent application to obtain a foreign filing license?