1965|1967 289 hi|po vs the 1969|1970 302 boss motor
1965-1967 289 hi-po vs the 1969-1970 302 boss motor
The Boss 302 was a 302 windsor block w/ 351C style heads & a special intake and internals. VERY different small blocks.
HiPo 289 vs Boss 302 - Mustang Forums at StangNet
The Boss 302 obviously displaced 13 cubic inches more than the 289 HiPo; but it also had a 4-bolt-main-bearing-cap block with thicker block deck and cylinder ...
289 vs 302 dilemna | Vintage Mustang Forums
Some of the mid to late 70 302 blocks are weaker than the 289 block. there are subtle casting differences. good luck. If you want to go the 302 ...
289 vs 302 | Ford Muscle Cars Tech Forum
Both engines have a 4.00" bore. Difference is the 289 has a 2-7/8" stroke, where the 302 has a 3.00" stroke. They both use the same pistons.
Differences - 302 vs 289 block? | Ford Mustang Forums - Corral.net
It is not uncommon to find a 302 block that was cast and assembled during the summer of 1967 as a 289ci engine. Though 302 blocks looked ...
Is it easy to tell the difference between a 302 and a 289 - Club Cobra
302 did not convert over to 4 bolt harmonic balancers until 1970. The 1969 Boss 302 balancer is almost identical to a 289 Hi Po unit. 289 ...
289 v 302 differences? | The H.A.M.B. - The Jalopy Journal
The differences between a 289 and 302 are negligible, mainly the 302 stroke is .13 longer. The actual differences are mainly limited to the crankshaft and the ...
All You Need to Know About the Mustang Hi-Po 289: Part 1
Unless you're restoring a K-code 1965-1967 Mustang or are interested in building an authentic 289 Hi-Po small-block for your non–K-code Mustang, ...
Ford Boss 302 engine - Wikipedia
The original version of this engine was used in the 1969 and 1970 Boss 302 Mustangs and Cougar Eliminators and was constructed by attaching heads designed for ...
Choose One Mustang: 1969 Mach 1 Versus 1970 BOSS 302
The iconic 302 cubic-inch Hi-Po V8 powers the homologation Mustang by using a 302W engine block combined with a 351C's cylinder heads.
History Of Ford Mustang Boss Models - EN.WHEELZ.ME
Available in the Boss 302 Mustangs of 1969–70, it's a unique Ford small-block engine featuring a thin-wall, high nickel content block casting.
289 vs. 302 whats better for my mustang - Hot Rod Forum
065 off the deck. If you remember the Boss 302, it had the same rod length as the 289. Dont get me wrong, the 289 was a great engine, as ...
Identifying Fords 260 and 289 V8 - autohistorypreservationsociety.org
The 289 Hi-Po and Boss 302 used the same rod length at 5.155″, but they were heavier beam and cap forgings, with 3/8″ bolts. They were also machined differently ...
Ford 289 Hypo vs. 302 Hypo - the Pelican Parts Forum!
According to our building's Mustang expert, there is no 302 hypo motor. There's the 302 Boss and the 351 Windsor and Cleveland, but the 351 ...
Boss 302 Engine/transmission question | Mustang Forums at StangNet
A2: Casting numbers on a BOSS 302 should be C80E-6015-B, C8FE-6015-B for early '69. C9ZE-6015A or B or D0ZE-6015-A for '69. D0ZE-6015-B for '69 ...
Ford small block engine - Wikipedia
Cast iron · Deck height: · 9.480" (1969–70 351W) · 9.503" (1971–96 351W) · 8.201–8.210" (BOSS 302) · 8.206" (221, 260, 289, 302).
What made the Ford Mustang Boss 302 engine special, and how did ...
The 1969 Boss 302 was developed for the Trans Am series that had a 5 liter limit. Ford had developed the 351 Cleveland 4 barrel heads that ...
Ford Mustang (Mk1) Boss 302 1969 - GTPlanet
(Hi-Po), engine was a created by combining a Ford Windsor, (Assembly ... or something. From wikipedia: This "G Code" engine was rated ...
identifying a boss 302 block | Ford Mustang Forums - Corral.net
There were three different heads for the Boss 302 engine. In 1969 head casting number C9ZE-A had 63 CC chambers, 2.23/1.71 valves, push rod ...
302 Engine Specifications - Car Memories
This effort would lead to development of the Boss 302 in 1969. It was also during this development time that the famous Ford "tunnel port head" came about.