A Case for Double|Blind Review

A Case for Double-Blind Review - Academic Medicine

Double-blind review may increase the likelihood for women and members of other marginalized groups to have their research published.

A Case for Double-Blind Review - PubMed

A Case for Double-Blind Review.

A Case for Double-Blind Review

A Case for Double-Blind Review. Hirshfield Laura E. PhD. Academic MedicineAcademic Medicine. 95:p 1628, November 2020. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003665 ...

[1807.01408] Case for the double-blind peer review - arXiv

A survey of current research suggests that double-blind review offers a solution to many biases stemming from author's gender, seniority, or ...

Double-blind Peer Review... What are the benefits and drawbacks?

It suggests a focus on the number of “blinds” rather than the process itself. Anonymous reviewing is more straightforward in conveying that both ...

In which cases will single anonymized review be better than double?

2 Answers 2 ... The big advantage of single-blind review is ease. You do not have to anonymize the text before sending it for review (even ...

Double Blind Review reveals authors to reviewers - Feature Requests

This isn't anymore double-blind. Proposal for a solution: A different Email template should be used by the system in such a case, All the ...

Case for the double-blind peer review - NASA/ADS

A survey of current research indicates that double-blind review offers a solution to many biases stemming from author's gender, seniority, or location without ...

A Case for Double-Blind Review | Request PDF - ResearchGate

... Prior work has demonstrated that double-blind peer review increases both the representation of women and marginalised groups as authors, and may decrease ...

Can I mention my affiliation in the manuscript which will be ... - Editage

Journals that have a double blind review process usually ask for the title page (with author names and affiliations) to be separated from the manuscript.

The Case For and Against Double-blind Reviews - Semantic Scholar

It is concluded, at least for these journals, that double-blind review does not benefit female authors and may, in the long run, be detrimental.

(PDF) Case for the double-blind peer review - Academia.edu

Peer review is a process designed to produce a fair assessment of research quality prior to publication of scholarly work in a journal.

A case for double-blind reviewing in software engineering

This letter is to urge organizers of software engineering conferences to implement double-blind paper reviewing.

The Case For and Against Double-blind Reviews | bioRxiv

For that reason, many journals have adopted a double-blind reviewing policy wherein the reviewers are not revealed to the authors, and anything ...

Why Is Double-Blind Peer Review Bad for Publishing? - Enago

The goal of a double-blind review is admirable—we all want impartial peer reviews. But in practice, double-blind reviews are not possible, not ...

Review Information The cases for and against double-blind ... - PeerJ

All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor ...

Double-blind review reduced the average success of manuscripts in peer review; papers reviewed with author identities blinded received on ...

Double-anonymous peer review comes to JB | Journal of Bacteriology

Double-anonymous peer review, also known as double-blind or double-masked review, shields the identity of both the author and the reviewer from ...

Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty ...

Double-blind peer review, a system in which both reviewers' and authors' identities are hidden, is used by many medical journals to protect ...

Is Double-Blind Review Better? | American Physical Society

Double-blind peer review may strip a paper down to “just the science” — and may well be an effective and fairer option for some fields ...