Analyses of Rule 26

Rule 26. Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

A party may depose any person who has been identified as an expert whose opinions may be presented at trial. If Rule 26(a)(2)(B) requires a report from the ...

Revisiting Proportionality Under Rule 26(b)(1) - Bailey Glasser

The 2015 amendment to Rule 26(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is about continuity. That's because the proportionality analysis under Rule ...

RULE 26 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Relevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. All ...

The Complete Guide to the FRCP 26 Rules - Global Relay

Mandates under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) that parties make initial disclosures of documents and witnesses central to fact- ...

Revisiting Proportionality Under Rule 26(b)(1) - JAMS

The 2015 amendment to Rule 26(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is about continuity. That's because the proportionality analysis ...

Litigation, Overview - Rule 26(b) and Discovery Scope

Under FRCP 26(b)(1), parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the ...

FRCP 26: A Straight-Forward Guide to eDiscovery Obligations

Rule 26(f) describes a conference of the parties to cooperate and plan for eDiscovery. This conference is not necessarily held in person and is ...

Rule 26: Proportionality, Meet and Confer, and Discovery Plans

As it pertains to ediscovery, proportionality represents a global cost-benefit analysis, whereby the court considers the needs of the case and ...

Proportionality and necessity under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ...

Rule 26(b), as amended, still provides that parties “may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or ...

The Burden of Privacy In Discovery - Judicature - Duke University

Historically, the scope of discovery under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and its state law analogues was defined exclusively in terms of ...

General Provisions Governing Discovery, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 | Casetext

The Cole's Wexford opinion provides a thorough dissection of the history and past iterations of Rule 26 and a clear explanation of the status of the current ...

Four Years of Experience with Rule 26(A)(1)

Rule 26(a) (1), along with other amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil. Procedure, was approved by the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, the Standing.

Battaglia Disclosure and Discovery Manual Under the Federal Rules ...

compliance with Rule 26 disclosures and the Rule 26(f) conference. The ... As a rule of thumb, the “hearsay” analysis of any document should start with ...

Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

Relevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. All ...

Litigation, Overview - Initial Disclosures under Rule 26(a): Discovery

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) requires that a party produce certain documents and/or information that it intends to use to support its claims or ...

Privacy as Proportionality Under Rule 26(b)(1)

Further, it shows that many of the cases that purport to rely on Rule 26(b)(1) to protect privacy interests are, in fact, engaged in an analysis ...

Rule 26: General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure

Rules Serv. 34.41, Case 1 (Rule 26 contemplates "examinations not merely for the narrow purpose of adducing testimony which may be offered in evidence but also ...

General Provisions Governing Discovery, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 | Casetext

... analysis with a lengthy discussion of proportionality under the Federal Rules. In particular, he noted that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1 ...

Expert Discovery Returns to the Past - Federal Bar Association

The 1993 Rule 26 amend- ments made attorney-expert communications discoverable, so that over the past 17 years written correspondence between counsel and a ...

The Privacy-Protection Hook in the Federal Rules - Judicature

Accordingly, they argue, parties seeking to avoid discovery of relevant-but-private information may no longer need to seek a protective order under Rule 26(c) ...