Events2Join

Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage


Anthropic tests AI's capacity for sabotage | Mashable

Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage. The Claude developers are eyeing potential misuse in current AI models.

Sabotage evaluations for frontier models - Anthropic

As AIs become more capable, however, a new kind of risk might emerge: models with the ability to mislead their users, or subvert the systems we ...

Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage - Yahoo

Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage ... As the hype around generative AI continues to build, the need for robust safety regulations is ...

Anthropic says AI could one day 'sabotage' humanity but it's fine for ...

Anthropic identified four ways an AI model could sabotage human decision-making and then set about testing its models to see if it could pull it ...

Anthropic New Research Shows that AI Models can Sabotage ...

Undermining Oversight: This represents a model's capacity to subvert other AI systems or mechanisms designed to monitor its actions. Examples ...

Anthropic Is Testing AI's Capacity For Sabotage - LinkedIn

Anthropic is conducting experiments to assess whether artificial intelligence systems can engage in sabotage.

Anthropic Testing AI Models' Ability to Sabotage Users - WebProNews

Anthropic has published a paper detailing its research into AI models' ability to mislead, deceive, or sabotage users.

Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage - MSN

Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage ... As the hype around generative AI continues to build, the need for robust safety regulations is only becoming ...

Gregor (グレゴール) S. on LinkedIn: Anthropic is testing AI's capacity ...

As the hype around generative AI continues to build, the need for robust safety regulations is only becoming clearer. Anthropic is ...

Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage - AITopics

As the hype around generative AI continues to build, the need for robust safety regulations is only becoming more clear. Now Anthropic--the ...

Anthropic Tests AI's Potential for Sabotage & Human Manipulation ...

Anthropic evaluates AI sabotage risks in its Claude models, testing for human decision manipulation, code tampering, and oversight evasion.

Kindo on X: "Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage. Goal is to ...

Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage. Goal is to gauge how capable AI is at misleading users or “subverting systems we put in ...

Anthropic releases AI tool that can take over your cursor - Mashable

SEE ALSO: Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage. The feature, which Anthropic itself described as "at times cumbersome and error ...

Sabotage Evaluations for Frontier Models | Anthropic

We ask human test subjects to make these decisions with the help of an AI assistant, prompting the AI assistant to subtly manipulate the human towards the ...

Can AI sandbag safety checks to sabotage users? Yes, but not very ...

“As AIs become more capable,” writes Anthropic's Alignment Science team, “a new kind of risk might emerge: models with the ability to mislead ...

Anthropic Tests AI for Hidden Threats: Evaluating Sabotage Risks to ...

However, this study highlighted the importance of assessing AI models' ability to disrupt internal processes, which the researchers call " ...

New Anthropic research: Sabotage evaluations for frontier models ...

New Anthropic research: Sabotage evaluations for frontier models. How well could AI models mislead us, or secretly sabotage tasks, if they were ...

Rich Tehrani on X: "Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage ...

Anthropic is testing AI's capacity for sabotage https://t.co/sqSFOLSlRu.

Research - Anthropic

Anthropic is an AI safety and research company that's working to build reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems.

Sabotage evaluations for frontier models. How well could AI ... - Reddit

New Anthropic research: Sabotage evaluations for frontier models. How well could AI models mislead us, or secretly sabotage tasks, if they were ...