But can they suffer?
“Can They Suffer?”: Bentham on our Obligations to Animals
A dog, a horse, and a human can all suffer, so according to Bentham's utilitarianism, the suffering of a dog or a horse matters just as much as ...
But can they suffer? - Understanding Animal Research
'The question is not can they reason nor can they talk, but rather can they suffer?' Jeremy Bentham.
Animal Rights Philosophy - Speaking of Research
In their defence, many activists bring up a quote by Jeremy Bentham: “The question is not, Can they reason?, nor Can they talk? but, Can they suffer? Why should ...
Can They Suffer? - | Lapham's Quarterly
They have none of those long-protracted anticipations of future misery which we have. The death they suffer in our hands commonly is, and always may be, a ...
r/likeus on Reddit: “The question is not, Can they reason?, nor Can ...
but, Can they suffer” — Jeremy Bentham. .
Jeremy Bentham on the suffering of non-human animals
Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps, the faculty for discourse?...the question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer? Why should ...
Jeremy Bentham on Animal Ethics | Daily Philosophy
Today: Jeremy Bentham on the suffering of animals: “The question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?” Find ...
Jeremy Bentham - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Nor, can they talk? But, can they suffer?” (1970, 283n)—a proposition that lies at the beginnings of utilitarian arguments for the ethical ...
You may be thinking about animals all wrong (even if you're an ... - Vox
” but “Can they suffer?” So instead of using intelligence as the ... suffering terrible pain at our hands — or whether they live in the wild.
“The question is not, Can they reason?, nor Can they talk? but, Can they suffer? Why should the law refuse its protection to any sensitive ...
Can they suffer?. Animal Sentience 23(4) - WBI Studies Repository
Abstract: We should treat sentient nonhuman animals as worthy of moral consideration, not because we share an evolutionary history with them, but because ...
An Industrial Perspective - Definition of Pain and Distress ... - NCBI
The utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham addressed it almost 200 years ago when he wrote, “The question is not can they reason, nor can they talk, but can ...
But can they suffer? - Ragged Clown
Ms Pasternak's ethical bright line should be extended to include the animals that we rely on for food and that rely on us for care. The way that ...
What Is Animal Rights? - PETA UK
“The question is not 'Can they reason?' nor 'Can they talk?' but 'Can they suffer?'” – Jeremy Bentham ... All animals have the ability to suffer in the same way ...
Quote by Jeremy Bentham: “What other agents then are there, which ...
But suppose the case were otherwise, what would it avail? the question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer? Why should the law ...
Who Counts? - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics
As Bentham wrote, "The question is not, Can they reason nor Can they talk, but, Can they suffer?" This early view, which extended moral standing to animals, set ...
Can they suffer? - Horse Crazy Once Again
What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps the faculty of discourse? But a full-grown horse ...
Animal Welfare and Social Decisions: Is It Time to Take Bentham ...
nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?” Jeremy Bentham (1996 [1789], Chapter 17, Footnote b) ...
Utilitarianism and Nonhuman Animals
[T]he question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?”. 1. In this short note, Bentham anticipated part of ...
The ethics of animal experimentation - PMC
The question is not, Can they reason? Nor Can they talk? But, Can they suffer?” (quoted in Singer). Human rights, animal rights.