Case for the double|blind peer review

[1807.01408] Case for the double-blind peer review - arXiv

A survey of current research suggests that double-blind review offers a solution to many biases stemming from author's gender, seniority, or ...

A Case for Double-Blind Review - Academic Medicine

A number of other scholarly disciplines, both large and small, use double-blind peer review for their journals as well. Thus, I urge the editors of Academic ...

Double-blind Peer Review... What are the benefits and drawbacks?

Double-blind peer review means the identity of both the author and reviewer is kept hidden. If the authors' identity is unknown to the reviewer, it will ...

Is there any evidence that double blind peer review systems are ...

Yes, there is scientific research on this topic. Using data from ACM WSDM'17, A. Tomkins et al. showed that double blind reviewers are less ...

Case for the double-blind peer review - NASA/ADS

A survey of current research indicates that double-blind review offers a solution to many biases stemming from author's gender, seniority, or location without ...

(PDF) Case for the double-blind peer review - ResearchGate

A survey of current research suggests that double-blind review offers a solution to many biases stemming from author's gender, seniority, or ...

A Case for Double-Blind Review - PubMed

Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1628. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003665. Author. Laura E Hirshfield ...

(PDF) Case for the double-blind peer review - Academia.edu

Peer review is a process designed to produce a fair assessment of research quality prior to publication of scholarly work in a journal.

The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer Review in Journals

Double-blind peer review puts its chips on the first of those to reduce socially prejudiced decisions and protect peer reviewers from the ...

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor ...

Double-blind review reduced the average success of manuscripts in peer review; papers reviewed with author identities blinded received on ...

Research Integrity and Peer Review - BioMed Central

In double-blind peer review neither authors nor reviewers know the identity of the others. Double-blinding should reduce the status bias and ...

[1807.01408] Case for the double-blind peer review - ar5iv - arXiv

Peer review is a process designed to produce a fair assessment of research quality prior to the publication of scholarly work in a journal.

Why Is Double-Blind Peer Review Bad for Publishing? - Enago

The goal of a double-blind review is admirable—we all want impartial peer reviews. But in practice, double-blind reviews are not possible, not ...

Double-blind peer review of manuscripts: opportunities, challenges ...

Open peer review, on the other hand, reveals the identity of the reviewers and authors to each other. This system aims at a greater transparency, accountability ...

Double-blind peer review explained: Tips for academic writers

Double-blind peer review is a process used in academic publishing where both the identities of the authors and the reviewers are kept hidden from each other.

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review - PNAS

Scientific peer review has been a cornerstone of the scientific method since the 1600s. Debate continues regarding the merits of single-blind review, ...

Can I mention my affiliation in the manuscript which will be ... - Editage

Journals that have a double blind review process usually ask for the title page (with author names and affiliations) to be separated from the manuscript.

The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific ...

Double-blind peer review, in which the names of authors and reviewers are masked, may present an opportunity for scientific literature to increase equity and ...

A case for double-blind reviewing in software engineering

Luckily, existing evidence suggests that these bias effects can be mitigated in peer review through the use of double-blind review. This is a constructive step ...

The Fiction of Double-Blind Reviewing: Evidence From the Social ...

The purpose of double-blind peer review is to hide non–paper-related signals (e.g., authors' affiliations) from an online manuscript system so that reviewers ...