Citizens United in Wisconsin

Wisconsin United To Amend – Overturn Citizens United – Money in ...

The spending of money is not speech, and political spending can be limited to allow all Americans to participate in the democratic process. Our mission is to ...

On the 14th Anniversary of Citizens United, Wisconsin Democracy ...

January 22, 2024 MADISON, WI – Fourteen years after the disastrous ruling in Citizens United v. FEC we continue to see political spending by ...

Overturn Citizens United - Wisconsin Democracy Campaign

HELP OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED and BUILD ELECTION CAMPAIGN INTEGRITY Join the national movement to help overturn the disastrous U.S. Supreme Court ruling in ...

Citizens United Explained | Brennan Center for Justice

The 2010 Supreme Court decision further tilted political influence toward wealthy donors and corporations.

Citizens United is infamous. But an obscure case years later made ...

The decision from the US Supreme Court opened up a huge loophole in state campaign finance law now being taken advantage by the ultrawealthy.

Legal | Citizens United v. FEC

On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission overruling an earlier decision.

On Citizens United anniversary, legislators and advocates call for ...

Several Wisconsin legislators and campaign finance reform advocates held a press conference to promote a constitutional amendment that would reverse the flood ...

Citizens United in Wisconsin: a decade of disaster

In the 2012 18th Senate District race independent expenditure groups spent nearly $1.1 million compared to about $590,800 by incumbent Democrat ...

Election Deniers Skirted Campaign Finance Laws in Wisconsin

Election denial is fueled by lies, polarization — and money. In many races, wealthy donors have exploited weak and poorly enforced campaign ...

Citizens United and the Wisconsin Vote - Hoover Institution

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett got millions in support from unions, whose contributions were legitimized by the Supreme Court...

Citizens United and the States

The Court ruled that the federal government may not prohibit direct corporate and union spending on advertising for candidates' elections. While the ruling does ...

Comments from Jim Crist, Co-Chair, United To Amend

Wisconsin United To Amend was formed in early 2010, shortly after the Citizens United v. FEC decision. The April 2011 referendums in Madison and Dane County ...

Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign ...

Campaign to Overturn Citizens United Keeps Racking Up Wins

Seventeen more Wisconsin communities recently endorsed a constitutional amendment to get big money out of politics, bringing the state total of passed ...

Wisconsin Legislature: oag5-10

¶8. The United States Supreme Court determined that the federal prohibition on corporate independent expenditures was a ban on core political speech protected ...

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission - SCOTUSblog

Political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment, and the government may not keep corporations or unions from spending money.

WI-AG - End Citizens United | We the People, Not "We the Wealthy"

Press Releases. Let America Vote Inducts Loudenbeck, Toney, and Michels Into 2022 Voter Suppression Hall of Shame. Press Releases.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission - Britannica

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on January 21, 2010, ruled that laws preventing ...

Plain Talk: Let Wisconsin weigh in on Citizens United - The Cap Times

If the Republican-controlled Wisconsin Legislature refuses once again to consider a statewide referendum, there could be only one reason ...

About Us - Wisconsin United To Amend

Wisconsin United to Amend is a grassroots, cross-partisan citizens group. We are a part of the growing democracy reform movement.