Comparative judgement

The law of comparative judgment was conceived by L. L. Thurstone. In modern-day terminology, it is more aptly described as a model that is used to obtain ...

Comparative Judgement - Daisy Christodoulou

Comparative Judgement is a quicker and more accurate way of assessing open tasks like essays or extended pieces of writing.

Is comparative judgement just a quick form of multiple marking?

judgement (ACJ) and comparative judgements where the pairs being compared were assigned at random (random comparative judgement or RCJ). The two CJ studies ...

Comparative Judgement - No More Marking

Comparative Judgement assesses open-ended work more reliably than traditional marking. Comparative judgement is a process where judges compare two responses and ...

Comparative Judgement: The pros and cons | AQi powered by AQA

The biggest advantage of CJ in assessing academic performance is that each students' work is judged many times by many different examiners.

Assessing students' writing using comparative judgement

A new step that aims to bridge the gaps that still exist for staff, through an assessment process known as comparative judgement.

Comparative judgement - FutureLearn

Comparative judgement is based on the principle that people are better at making comparisons between pieces of work than at making absolute judgements about ...

Using Comparative Judgement to improve writing - The Education Hub

Comparative judgement is a process where judges (normally teachers) compare two responses and decide which is better. Research has shown the ...

Full article: Comparative judgement in education research

Here we present alternative methods based on comparative judgement (CJ) that have been growing in popularity over recent years.

Matching Comparative Judgement Data to the Curriculum

We can make some general assumptions because of the writing age, that other students who have scored above this scaled score, have achieved ...

Comparative judgement - Assessing writing - Consilium Education

Comparative Judgement is a different way of assessing writing. Instead of using a mark scheme, teachers read two pieces of writing and decide ...

Adaptive comparative judgement - Wikipedia

Adaptive comparative judgement ... Adaptive comparative judgement is a technique borrowed from psychophysics which is able to generate reliable results for ...

Comparative Judgement - No More Marking

Comparative judgement is a process where judges compare two responses and decide which is better. Research has shown the process to be as reliable as double ...

Comparative judgement: the next big revolution in assessment?

Instead of markers grading one essay at a time, comparative judgement requires the marker to look at a pair of essays, and to judge which one is ...

Comparative Judgement - Twinkl

Comparative judgement is comparing two pieces of students' work and deciding which is better. Teachers can generally make a snap judgement without needing to ...

What is Comparative Judgement? - YouTube

Daisy Christodoulou explains what Comparative Judgement is, and how it can help make marking more efficient and effective.

Comparative judgment: 21st century assessment

Comparative Judgement is a quicker and more accurate way of assessing open tasks like essays or extended pieces of writing. Find out more. © ...

Full article: Critiquing the rationales for using comparative judgement

We conceptualise and critique the notion that comparative judgment is 'intrinsically valid' due to its use of expert judges.

Editorial: Validity, reliability and efficiency of comparative judgement ...

Assessing complex skills such as writing, designing, or problem-solving is a challenge. Comparative judgement is considered to be a reliable and ...

Reliability and validity of benchmark rating and comparative ...

Comparative approaches to the assessment of writing: Reliability and validity of benchmark rating and comparative judgement. Authors. Renske ...