- Comparison of the Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery ...🔍
- Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive ...🔍
- Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical🔍
- Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Minimally Invasive ...🔍
- Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for ...🔍
- Minimally invasive surgery associated with worse survival for ...🔍
- Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early ...🔍
- Comparison of survival and post|operation outcomes for minimally ...🔍
Comparison of the Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery ...
Comparison of the Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery ...
We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes between Japanese women with uterine-confined and node-negative cervical cancer who underwent ...
Comparison of the Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery ...
Comparison of the survival outcomes of minimally invasive surgery with open surgery in patients with uterine-confined and node-negative cervical cancer.
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive ...
In the subgroup with cervical mass size ≤2 cm, patients with open surgery and MIS had similar PFS (5-year survival rate, 93.5% vs. 92.4%; P = 0.749) and OS (5- ...
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive ...
Compared to open RH, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was associated with higher recurrence rates. •. MIS RH was not a poor prognostic factor in patients with ...
Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical
001). There were no significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) based on the surgical approach. However, ...
Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Minimally Invasive ...
OS was defined as the time from surgery to the time of death from any cause. Patients who survived were censored at the time of the last follow- ...
Comparison of the Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery ...
They found that MIS did not compromise survival outcomes when compared with conventional open surgery. The research was properly designed. A large population of ...
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive ...
In total, 435 and 158 patients were assigned to open surgery and MIS groups, respectively. MIS group had significantly less parametrial invasion (6.3% vs. 15.4 ...
Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for ...
Some studies concluded that minimally invasive surgery was associated with an increased risk of death or recurrence compared with open surgery, ...
Minimally invasive surgery associated with worse survival for ...
Minimally invasive surgery associated with worse survival for women with cervical cancer compared to open hysterectomy ... The results of both ...
Comparison of the Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery ...
OS rates were 99.4% and 98.4% in the MIS and open groups, respectively (p= 0.8008).
Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early ...
The adoption of minimally invasive surgery coincided with a decline in the 4-year relative survival rate of 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.4) per year ...
Comparison of survival and post-operation outcomes for minimally ...
Minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) has obvious advantages in terms of surgical incision, but there is still no strong evidence of its long-term survival ...
Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical ...
Based on five studies, patients who had minimally invasive (n=1808) hysterectomy had a trend towards worse overall survival than those who had open surgery (n= ...
Comparing Surgical Approaches in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
At 3 years, minimally invasive surgery compared with open surgery was associated with lower rates of disease-free (91.2% vs 97.1%) and overall ( ...
Survival After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Radical Hysterectomy for ...
Conclusions: Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with poor survival outcomes compared to open surgery. Patients with FIGO ...
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for ...
The rate of disease-free survival at 4.5 years was 86.0% with minimally invasive surgery and 96.5% with open surgery, a difference of −10.6 ...
Comparison of minimally invasive versus open surgery in the ...
Two-year progression-free survival rates were 52.8% (SE±8.4) in the open group and 58.5% (SE±5.1) in the minimally invasive group (p=0.7). Two-year disease- ...
Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Hybrid Minimally Invasive ...
The primary end point of the MIRO trial was the rate of major intraoperative or postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery.
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive and ...
Among octogenarian and older patients, relative to open surgery (n = 53), MIS (n = 27) was associated with less operative blood loss, a shorter ...