- Comparison of the surgical outcomes of minimally ...🔍
- Comparison of the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive and ...🔍
- A Systematic Review Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Open ...🔍
- Comparison of the surgical outcomes of McKeown minimally ...🔍
- Comparison of 3 Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar ...🔍
- Minimally invasive versus open lumbar spinal fusion🔍
- A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Minimally Invasive ...🔍
- Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal ...🔍
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of minimally ...
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of minimally ... - PubMed
Background: As life expectancy continues to increase around the world, the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) could be beneficial for ...
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive and ...
Among aged patients, the use of MIS instead of open surgery might provide the benefits of fewer surgical complications and shorter postoperative ...
A Systematic Review Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Open ...
Comparison of MIS repair versus open repair had a rate of recurrence at 8.6% versus 1.6% (P < .00001). Length of hospital stay was 19.6 days versus 33.6 days (P ...
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of McKeown minimally ...
McKeown MIE is safe and operational for middle esophageal cancer, which is consistent with the principle of tumor radicalization.
Comparison of 3 Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar ...
We found no significant differences in outcomes related to the surgical procedure, such as length of hospital stay, perioperative blood loss, ...
Minimally invasive versus open lumbar spinal fusion: a matched ...
Independent factors associated with increased satisfaction with MIS lumbar fusion, compared with open surgery, included age < 58 years, first- ...
A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Minimally Invasive ...
MIS AP patients required less units of transfusion than P and AP patients while demonstrating lower postoperative narcotics consumption and ...
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal ...
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic ...
Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive thyroidectomy in thyroid ...
In order to compare the surgical outcomes between the groups, we used several perioperative parameters. These parameters included operative time, the number of ...
A comparison of 30‐day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive ...
In the propensity-weighted analysis, MISC was associated with lower rates of wound infections (1.1% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.01), lower blood transfusion ...
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal ...
In an analysis comparing surgical outcomes of MIE at high-volume versus low-volume centers, we found that there was no significant difference in overall ...
Surgical outcomes of patients who fail to reach minimal clinically ...
The extent to which patients clinically improve after spinal surgery is captured by the concept of the minimal clinically important difference ( ...
Surgical outcomes of patients who fail to reach minimal clinically ...
There were improvements across the PROs of both groups through 2 years, and there were no differences in any PROs between the O-TLIF and MIS-TLIF cohorts.
Peer Review reports - BMC Surgery
... minimally invasive surgery (MIS) could be ... Peer Review reports. From: Comparison of the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive and open surgery ...
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive ... - OUCI
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive and open surgery for octogenarian and older compared to younger gastric cancer patients: a ...
Surgical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar ...
Conclusions Our study found no difference between intraoperative use of SL compared with SM in clinical outcomes through the 12-month follow-up ...
Outcomes assessment and minimally invasive surgery
... comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. JACS 185: 315–327. CAS ...
Differences between outcomes of minimally invasive vs open ...
Results: The findings indicated that outpatient techniques were safe and effective, with a 2.83% complication rate. All procedures significantly improved VAS ...
A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic ...
There was no statistically significant difference noted between length of stay, estimated blood loss, intraoperative, and post-operative complications between ...
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port ... - MDPI
According to a retrospective review conducted by Bingmer et al., laparotomy decreased by 34.9% from 135.5 to 88.2 from 2000 to 2018, but laparoscopic surgery ...