Could Morality Have a Transcendent Evolved Purpose?

There can be no transcendent purpose, because no widely-understood natural process can generate such purpose. Transcendent purpose is a subject for religion.

Moral realism and the possibility of transcendence : r/askphilosophy

I've tried to get through some moral realist literature and make sense of it, but the bold above is where I have trouble: I can find no moral ...

Does our modern ethics and morality need a transcendent being or ...

So the basis of human ethics is human nature. Religion has nothing to do with it. Religion can help reinforce the good stuff or work to ...

The Transcendence of Morality | Marx and Ethics - Oxford Academic

If individuals control the processes of production which give rise to morality, they would be at least indirectly in control of their morality rather than ...

Why is a transcendent moral standard necessary? - Quora

Morality is subjective. Once you've determined a subjective goal, you can then make objective movements towards that goal. For example, for most ...

Does Morality come from God, Evolution or both?

the science itself simply could tell us that humans did indeed develop a moral instinct through the evolutionary process… the same process that ...

Did Morals Evolve? - bethinking.org

If the answer is yes, then we are in trouble. I have consistently put forth what I believe to be a very strong argument for the existence of a personal God ...

Is Morality Derived From a Transcendent Standard?

But you have to realize that if you reject the notion of the reality of the transcendent and the spiritual, you are forced with having to give ...

Can Evolution Explain Morality?: Religion, science and the desire to ...

They do not have to undergo lengthy inculturation before expressing their genetically determined moral propensities. Cultural formation gives content to ...

ethics - Can objective morality exist apart from the existence of a ...

Transcendent being is presented only in ethical subjectivist theories: divine command theory and ideal observer theory.

Is “Moral Law” Simply Herd Instinct or a Social Construct? - Medium

The moral law is obviously not the product of evolution. We, as humans, have instincts, but the stronger instinct does not automatically win.

Can Evolution Debunk our Moral Beliefs? - Epoche Magazine

Perhaps our belief in a stable, objective morality is a last vestige of pre-Darwinian “religiousism”, and philosophers should be looking to our evolutionary ...

Evolution Can't Explain Morality - Stand to Reason

Because we know that morality can't be reduced to selfishness. Why do we know that? Because our moral rules are against selfishness and for ...

A Pathway to Objective Morality: Why the Case for Scientific ...

Michael Schremer suggests that evolution transcends culture and that moral and ethics also transcend culture as they are shaped by cultural ...

The Objective Morality of Transcendent Experience Part 1

So we are likely indeed to have intuitions and genes for self-sacrifice that will lead us to seek and eventually find transcendent experience, ...

Edward O. Wilson on The Biological Basis of Morality - The Atlantic

Secular philosophers of a transcendental bent may seem to be radically different from theologians, but they are actually quite similar, at least ...

Did a Concern for the Species Influence Our Moral Development?

Can sociocultural evolution account for the formation of moral truth? ... But this seems counter intuitive given our present acceptance of many ...

Evolution cannot take credit for morality

Many atheists believe that morality came about through an evolutionary process. We have previously examined this view and shown it to be mistaken.

Can Morality Be Based in Our "Selfish" Evolutionary Past?

Objective and universal morals require a transcendent standard that purely naturalistic evolution cannot provide. Second, Dawkins does not ...

Moral Arguments for the Existence of God

Arguments that meet these standards could have value in making belief in God reasonable for some people, or even giving some people knowledge of ...