County taxpayers won't fund football stadium

County taxpayers won't fund football stadium | ksdk.com

If St. Louis pays for a new football stadium, it won't be getting any help from taxpayers in St. Louis County.

St. Louis County Exec Won't Support Funding For NFL Stadium ...

St. Louis County taxpayers "will not be asked to support a new football stadium on the downtown riverfront -- at least for now," according ...

St. Louis Cardinals owners plan to ask taxpayers to fund Busch ...

They didn't already have a football, hockey, and baseball team. They didn't already have teams and ask for assistance. Getting the stadiums was ...

Sales tax vote to fund Chiefs, Royals stadium fails in Jackson County

Jackson County voters ...

St. Louis Cardinals eye taxpayer-funded Busch Stadium upgrades

“Busch Stadium is fine now, but it won't be fine at some point in the future.” ... Jackson County voters reject sales tax measure that would fund ...

Why Kansas City rejected Chiefs, Royals stadium tax vote

In a landslide, Jackson County voters said no to Question 1, a proposal to extend a 3/8th-cent sales tax to help fund the stadiums.

Chiefs' stadium plan needs a pivot after fans reject tax measure

After voters resoundingly shot down the Chiefs' push for a tax measure to fund upgrades at Arrowhead Stadium, the franchise now needs to ...

Why are taxpayers sometimes forced to pay for the NFL ... - Quora

Stadium funding packages these days assume that X Corp. will cough up $5 to 10 million a year for those rights, and the financing won't work ...

Voters REJECT Royals & Chiefs Stadium tax: KC Sports in question

... County, Missouri, resoundingly voted down a sales tax measure that would helped to fund a new downtown ballpark along with major renovations ...

Fields of Failure: The Scandal of Taxpayer Funded Stadiums

Between 2000 and 2011, Houston and Harris County spent a combined $605.5 million in taxpayer funds on the construction of stadiums used by teams in the MLB, NFL ...

Stadium subsidy stupidity hits new record - Reason Magazine

The Metropolitan Council of Nashville and Davidson County voted to spend $1.26 billion in taxpayer money on a new government-owned stadium.

Taxpayer-funded football stadiums rarely pay off. So why do cities ...

... County and West Virginia University found that over a 30-year ... taxpayer funding for the Bears' stadium. Local officials asserted ...

If voters OK taxes for a ballpark, Royals will ask city and state for up ...

Who will pay for the new Royals stadium? The last time that Jackson County voters OK'd a sales tax to fund the Chiefs and Royals in 2006, local ...

The economics of taxpayer-subsidized stadiums - The Week

Like any taxpayer-related issue, subsidizing public funds for sports stadiums remains controversial. ... Taxpayers in Cobb County are ...

Kansas City schools and libraries stand to lose millions in tax ...

Owners of the proposed Royals stadium won't pay property taxes because the land it's on would belong to Jackson County.

Taxpayers Are About to Subsidize a Lot More Sports Stadiums

Combined, the two stadiums will end up receiving more than $1.1 billion in public funding, not counting tax breaks. Something similar is ...

Why did the Jackson County stadium tax fail so badly? - The Beacon

“It came with a load of baggage.” If a voter supported funding the Chiefs but not the Royals, they were a “no” vote. If they wanted a downtown ...

When voters say 'no' to new stadiums, what do professional sports ...

The defeat Tuesday of a three-eighths cent sales tax to fund a new downtown Royals ballpark and renovate the Chiefs' Arrowhead Stadium was ...

Cobb County Taxpayers Won't Get A Say On Funding The Braves ...

BaseballBasketballFootballHockey. Cobb County Taxpayers Won't Get A Say On Funding The Braves' Stadium. Barry Petchesky ...

Why Tax-Payer Funded Sports Stadiums Are a Huge Scam - YouTube

Billionaire sports team owners want us to think that subsidizing stadiums is good for cities. They're lying — and sports fans are pissed.