Criteria and Process for Selection of External Reviewers

External reviewers should consider whether the plans of the department are appropriate, considering such factors as the current condition of the program, trends ...

Your External Reviewers for Tenure - - The Professor Is In

Therefore the process of choosing the tenure reviewers is of utmost importance. As I've already explained, tenured faculty in your department ...

External Reviewer Qualification and Selection Process | TENURE ...

Proposed exceptions to the “Research I” criterion must be carefully assessed by the Dean's Office. Faculty who earned tenure and promotion at a ...

Guidelines for the Selection of External Reviewers for Faculty ...

1. Department Promotion and Tenure guidelines should clearly describe the process by which external reviewers will be selected and what will be ...

6.3.Guidelines for Selecting Reviewers and Reviewing External ...

External reviewers are asked to evaluate a candidate's promotion and tenure package, and then provide recommendations addressing the following considerations.

Information on External Reviewers | University of Texas at San Antonio

Responsibility for choosing external reviewers rests with the Department Chair, but should involve consultation with others, including the faculty candidate, ...

Guidelines for Choosing External Reviews

External reviewers must be senior to the person being reviewed. Thus, candidates for promotion to associate professor must be reviewed by people at the rank of ...

Best practices for choosing external reviewers for tenure applications?

... external reviewers, at least in part because if the main criteria for tenure is teaching and service, it's hard to see how external reviewers ...

Guidelines for the Selection of External Reviewers

Process: The department submits the names of 8 to 12 possible external reviewers, with brief professional information on each. The information should include:.

External Review Process and Payment Guidelines

External Review Process. 1. Selecting the external reviewer a. The ideal reviewer will possess the following characteristics:.

External Review Guidelines for Candidates & Deans - UNCSA

Selection of External Reviewers. Reviewers should be highly regarded and recognized professionals in the candidate's field and able to evaluate the quality, ...

ADE/ADFL Recommendations for the Use of External Reviewers for...

... selection, solicitation, and management of external reviewers, one of the most important elements of the tenure review process ... criteria necessary to ...

Criteria for External Reviewers

More information on the TRU External Review process can be found in, A ... Criteria for Selecting External Reviewers. The Dean and Program Chairperson ...

External Reviews | New York State Education Department

It is expected that the proposed external reviewer is a recognized expert in the field of the proposed program, as demonstrated by appropriate ...

VPAA 4.5.24 External Reviews for Promotion and Tenure The UND ...

External reviewers must meet the following criteria: a. At or above ... secured and evaluated as part of the external review process.

GUIDELINES FOR CHOOSING EXTERNAL REVIEWERS

This guideline outlines the recommended practice for selecting external reviewers. All tenure track faculty undergoing 6th year, promotion to full Professor ...

What to Know About the External Scholarship Review Process for ...

Instructions to the external reviewers might include (a) considering if the candidate would likely receive tenure at the reviewer's institution, ...

External Review Letters - Office of the Provost - University of Oregon

The unit head must compile a list of possible external reviewers. The candidate may also provide a list of potential reviewers, which should be compiled without ...

Selecting external reviewers for tenure - Higher Ed Professor

External reviewers will typically respond to a candidate's CV, a few exemplar publications, and a personal narrative. Every pre-tenure faculty ...

External Reviewer Guidelines | Office of Faculty Affairs

Units should create lists of potential reviewers made up of 50% names recommended by the candidate and 50% by which ever other individuals (i.e., the chair, the ...