Events2Join

DOS 6.22 vs DOS7.0 compatibility difference


DOS 6.22 vs DOS7.0 compatibility difference - VOGONS

Generally it is thought that DOS 7.1 is 100% compatible with DOS 6.22. BUT DOS 7.0, which Windows 95 is reported to have, is apparently not. I' ...

Why do people like DOS 6.2 over say FreeDOS or even Dos 7.x ...

FreeDOS isn't compatible with Windows 3.11, for starters. It's pretty compatible otherwise, but I almost always set up my DOS compatible PCs with Windows 3.11.

Comparison of DOS operating systems - Wikipedia

This article details versions of MS-DOS, IBM PC DOS, and at least partially compatible disk operating systems. It does not include the many other operating ...

Is there a reason to prefer earlier versions of MS-DOS over later?

I understand MS-DOS to be backwards-compatible, so is there a reason to run a version earlier than the last (6.22) on an old computer?

MS DOS 6.22 vs IBM PC-DOS 7.0 - Neowin

... DOS and PC-DOS are extremely compatible, and nearly identical in function. (you also left out DR-DOS, if you want to compare different flavors).

Recommended DOS Versions | Vintage Computer Federation Forums

For me, DOS 5.0 is the general winner for 286's and below, while I run DOS 6.22 on 386's and higher. Exception being if I have a memory card ...

MS-DOS 7 - Wikipedia

Windows 95 RTM reports it as MS-DOS 7.0, and Windows 95 OSR 2.x and Windows 98 report as 7.1. The real-mode MS-DOS 7.x is contained in ...

Upgrade ms-dos 6.22 to 7.01? - Google Groups

You need to use Setver to allow older versions of DOS COM and EXE files to work with DOS7. ... checking, and will install on any DOS revision 0..127, as long as

Comparison of DOS operating systems - Microsoft Wiki | Fandom

So very soon an IBM-compatible architecture became the goal, and before long all 8086-family computers closely emulated IBM hardware, and only a single version ...

Testing MS-DOS limitations - Windows 9x/ME - MSFN

MS-DOS 6 through 6.22 include the HIMEM.SYS XMS 3.x driver which raises the system memory ceiling from 16 MB to 64 MB. 64 MB or 65,536 KB is ...

MS-DOS Version History - DOS Wiki - Fandom

Microsoft DOS 6.22 was the last standalone version from Microsoft. It was also the last from Microsoft to run on an 8088, 8086, or 286. 6.22 adds DriveSpace, a ...

MS-DOS 7.1 - Google Groups

In my research into the best DOS for my Model 30-286 I thought the choice was MS-DOS 6.22 versus PC-DOS 2000. I've stumbled across MS-DOS 7.1. It appears to ...

Demystifying MS-DOS Distribution - BetaArchive

The OEM version is labeled 'MS-DOS and Additional Tools', while the upgrade is 'MS-DOS'. The upgrade includes the additional tools as well, but ...

Which DOS? - VOGONS

1. DOS 6.22 supports multiple boot configuration (MultiConfig) blocks in the config.sys file. 2. More conventional memory can be squeezed out in ...

Dos 6, 7 Or Freedos? - Page 2 - Forums - Abandonia

So I'd choose 6.22, it was designed with compatibility in mind and 7.1 wasn't. No idea about FreeDOS, but I'd still bet that 6.22 is the most ...

Did DR DOS offer anything different or special compared to MS DOS?

Yes, definitely. DR's main product lines for the PC were CP/M-86 and Concurrent CP/M, which were not DOS compatible.

Can MS-DOS 6.22 (1994) Replace Windows 7? - YouTube

DOS may have been revolutionary for it's time but can you use it to do stuff we do today on windows 7 (or windows 8)? Well then let's try it ...

What's the most trustworthy version of MS-DOS 7.1 available?

So the question is: are there "better" versions of MS-DOS 7.10 in circulation? Whatever is closer to MS-DOS 6.22 compatibility and functionality ...

PC DOS vs MS-DOS - The Silicon Underground

Prior to version 6, the differences between PC DOS and MS-DOS were mostly cosmetic. ... It's still highly compatible with MS-DOS 6.22, but uses ...

Dos 6, 7 Or Freedos? [Archive] - Forums - Abandonia

Dos 6.2 is the most 'pure' DOS of them all and will give no compatibility problems. DOS 7.1 is probably more or less covered in your Win98 installation. I am ...