Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor ...

Charles Fox was Executive Editor of Functional Ecology when this experiment was initiated and was Senior Editor of the journal during the entire experiment.

In this paper, we explore the effect of blinding on the outcomes of peer review, examining reviewer ratings and editorial decisions.

Double-blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor ...

Double-blind review reduced the average success of manuscripts in peer review; papers reviewed with author identities blinded received on average lower ratings ...

Double‐blind peer review affects r - H1 Connect

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal. Fox CW et al. Functional Ecology. 2023 May; 37(5):1144-1157.

Double-blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor ...

Papers reviewed double-blind were on average less successful in the peer review process; they received lower ratings from reviewers and were ...

Peer review bias and double-blind reviewing: a new study

One important worry is that peer reviewers (or editors) might be biased in their assessment of manuscripts based on their knowledge, or guesses, ...

Double-anonymous peer review reduces reviewer bias, finds three ...

Interestingly, anonymising author details had no effect on gender differences in reviewer ratings or editor decisions. What can we take away ...

Why is the review process not double blinded, and then unblinded ...

The biggest advantage is that it does slightly lower the "gatekeeper" effect in which a reviewer dismisses a paper before reading it due to the ...

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and ... - Altmetric

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal · About this Attention Score · Mentioned by · Citations · Readers on · X ...

Double-anonymous peer review reduces reviewer bias, finds a three ...

The British Ecological Society has published the results of a three-year randomized trial comparing double and single-anonymous peer review.

Why Is Double-Blind Peer Review Bad for Publishing? - Enago

Advocates believe this double anonymity makes for more candid and unbiased reviews: the reviewer will only consider the merit of the paper ...

(PDF) Double‐blind peer review—An experiment - ResearchGate

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal ... There is substantial evidence that systemic biases influence the ...

Is Double-Blind Review Better? | American Physical Society

So the CSWP suggested that double-blind review should be the standard. But, according to Brown, the editors felt that trying to hide every single author ...

Does double-blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top ...

How does double-blind peer review affect agreement among reviewers? 3. Can ... The effect of double-blinding on reviewer rating and paper acceptance.

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review - PNAS

Our analysis shows that single-blind reviewing confers a significant advantage to papers with famous authors and authors from high-prestige institutions.

Does Double-blind Peer Review Reduce Bias? - Information Matters

If double-blind review is better at evaluating papers only on their quality, it should not reject papers of high quality. Indeed, we find that ...

Double-anonymous review is an effective way of combating status ...

To reduce these biases and make peer review fairer, some journals have adopted double-anonymous peer review, peer review in which the reviewers ...

Switching to double-anonymous peer review - The Applied Ecologist

The Associate Editor then invites other researchers, known as reviewers, to assess the quality, appropriateness and reliability of the research ...

Double-blind peer review explained: Tips for academic writers

Double-blind peer review is a process used in academic publishing where both the identities of the authors and the reviewers are kept hidden from each other.

Double-blind review procedure in the Journal of Vegetation Science ...

Double-blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology, 37, 1144–1157. https://doi ...