Events2Join

Double Anonymous Proposal Information


Dual-Anonymous Peer Review (DAPR) - NASA Science

The objective of dual-anonymous peer review is to minimize the impact of implicit or unconscious bias in the evaluation of the merit of a proposal.

Dual-Anonymous Guidelines — ALMA Science Portal at NRAO

To reduce any biases as much as possible, ALMA requires proposals to be written in an anonymous fashion. In a dual-anonymous review, the proposal team does ...

Double Anonymous Proposal Information - Large Millimeter Telescope

Dual anonymous reviews are becoming the standard for proposal and grant reviews in astronomy (HST, JWST, ALMA, NASA grants, Gemini, ESO, NOIRlab, etc.). This ...

Dual-Anonymous Guidelines - Eso.org

Anonymous review does not mean that the proposals are anonymous, but that the team information is kept separated from the scientific evaluation process. The ...

Dual Anonymous Proposals Guide for Reviewers

Please note that the goal in anonymizing proposals is not to reduce content to the extent that useful information is eliminated. Proposers are encouraged to ...

Dual Anonymous Guidance

Guidance for Reviewers · Evaluate proposals based solely on the anonymous proposal content, following the evaluation criteria. · Do not try to guess the ...

What is dual-anonymous peer review and how do I adhere to it?

To ensure that the proposal review process is as fair and unbiased as possible, ALMA is beginning dual-anonymous review in Cycle 8 2021. In a dual-anonymous ...

Dual-Anonymous Peer Review (DAPR) - NASA

During the TechFlights proposal review process, the identity of reviewers will not be shared with proposers, and the identity of proposers will not be ...

Dual Anonymous Peer Review (DAPR): Information for Proposers

Many NASA solicitations and requests for technical proposals are using a DAPR process to conduct equitable evaluations.

How does it work dual anonymous peer-review and how do I adhere ...

While proposers will still enter their names and affiliations in the ESO Phase 1 proposal, this information will not appear on the proposal cover sheet, nor in ...

Dual-Anonymous Guidelines — ALMA Science Portal at NRAO

In a dual-anonymous review, the proposal team does not know the identity of the reviewers, and the reviewers do not know the identity of the proposal team. The ...

Avoiding Non-Compliant Dual Anonymous Proposals in Cycle 25 ...

Avoiding Non-Compliant Dual Anonymous Proposals in Cycle 25 and Beyond · Displaying the PI or Co-I names within text that is supposed to be anonymized · Using ...

JWST Anonymous Proposal Reviews

STScI has implemented a dual-anonymous proposal review process, where the identities of the proposing team are concealed from reviewers.

Proposer Guidelines for NASA Keck Dual Anonymous Reviews

Each of these may reveal (or strongly imply) the identity of the investigators on the proposal. In these instances, proposers must use language ...

Dual-Anonymous Peer Review at NASA Dan Evans, Astrophysics ...

NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD) is strongly committed to ensuring that the review of proposals is performed in an.

Anonymization Instructions for PIs | NOIRLab Science

NOIRLab TAC uses a Dual Anonymous review process, in which the proposals are ... In the second stage of the process, additional, non-anonymized information ...

Guidelines for writing anonymous proposals under the dual ...

Guidelines for writing anonymous proposals under the dual-anonymous review process (DARP) · Do not claim ownership of past work, e.g., "my ...

New EMSL Double-blind Pilot Makes Research Proposal Review ...

Through the double-blind peer review process, neither the proposal submitter, nor the proposal reviewer, are aware of one another's identities ...

Cycle 9 Dual Anonymous Review | SOFIA Science Center

It has been proven to mitigate possible unconscious biases which may affect proposal evaluation. The primary intent of dual-anonymous peer review is to ...

Does double anonymous peer review reduce bias? - Wiley

We could then add or exclude author information as necessary - we included author details in review invitations in the single-anonymous but not ...