Dual|Anonymous Proposal Review

Dual-Anonymous Peer Review (DAPR) - NASA Science

The objective of dual-anonymous peer review is to minimize the impact of implicit or unconscious bias in the evaluation of the merit of a proposal.

Dual-Anonymous Guidelines — ALMA Science Portal at NRAO

To reduce any biases as much as possible, ALMA requires proposals to be written in an anonymous fashion. In a dual-anonymous review, the proposal team does ...

JWST Anonymous Proposal Reviews

STScI has implemented a dual-anonymous proposal review process, where the identities of the proposing team are concealed from reviewers.

Dual-Anonymous Guidelines - Eso.org

In this paradigm, the principal investigator (and more in general the proposing team) does not know who the reviewer/s will be, while the reviewers are provided ...

Dual-Anonymous Peer Review (DAPR) - NASA

During the TechFlights proposal review process, the identity of reviewers will not be shared with proposers, and the identity of proposers will not be ...

Frequently Asked Questions — ALMA Science Portal at NRAO

2022). To ensure that the proposal review process is as fair and unbiased as possible, the ALMA proposal review process follows a dual-anonymous system. In a ...

Dual Anonymous Proposals Guide for Reviewers

This page provides a guide for reviewers in the JWST peer review on the dual anonymous proposal process used in Cycle 4. At the time of the ...

Dual Anonymous Guidance

Dual anonymous reviews have been shown to reduce bias in the evaluation of scientific research proposals, keeping the focus of peer review on the scientific ...

What is dual-anonymous peer review and how do I adhere to it?

To ensure that the proposal review process is as fair and unbiased as possible, ALMA is beginning dual-anonymous review in Cycle 8 2021. In a dual-anonymous ...

Proposer Guidelines for NASA Keck Dual Anonymous Reviews

The NASA Keck proposal review process uses a Dual Anonymous Proposal Review (DAPR) format. The DAPR conceals the proposers' identities from ...

Dual-Anonymous Peer Review at NASA Dan Evans, Astrophysics ...

NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD) is strongly committed to ensuring that the review of proposals is performed in an.

How does it work dual anonymous peer-review and how do I adhere ...

While proposers will still enter their names and affiliations in the ESO Phase 1 proposal, this information will not appear on the proposal cover sheet, nor in ...

Guidelines for Reviewers - ALMA Science Portal at NAOJ

Please refer to the dual-anonymous guidelines for reviewers for guides on how to approach the proposal review under the dual-anonymous policy, and for a ...

Proposer Guidelines for NASA Keck Dual Anonymous Reviews

The NASA Keck proposal review process is now using a Dual Anonymous Proposal Review (DAPR) format. The DAPR conceals the proposer's identities from the ...

Double Anonymous Proposal Information - Large Millimeter Telescope

This process aims to focus the review on science and mitigate biases associated with the proposal authors and team. For example, dual anonymous reviews have ...

Dual Anonymous Peer Review (DAPR): Information for Proposers

Many NASA solicitations and requests for technical proposals are using a DAPR process to conduct equitable evaluations.

Dual-anonymous peer review gains traction | Physics Today

The three completed dual-anonymous peer review cycles resulted in 30% of winning proposals coming from PIs who had not led successful proposals ...

Avoiding Non-Compliant Dual Anonymous Proposals in Cycle 25 ...

The Chandra peer review is a dual-anonymous format and proposers must anonymize the text of their Scientific Justification.

New EMSL Double-blind Pilot Makes Research Proposal Review ...

Daniel Evans, assistant deputy associated administrator for research at NASA, said before implementing their dual anonymous review, they ...

The Value of a Dual Anonymous System for Reducing Bias in ...

Dual anonymous review ... proposal and paper acceptance with underrepresented groups because of reviewer conscious or unconscious bias.