EPA Contends with Devastating Supreme Court Decision that Puts ...

This week the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) updated its “Waters of the United States” rule in response to the May 2023 Sackett v.

What the Supreme Court's Sackett v. EPA Ruling Means for ... - NRDC

The ruling last month by the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has enormous ramifications for the health of the ...

San Francisco Takes on EPA at the Supreme Court, a Surprising ...

San Francisco's case over water pollution standards that it says are unclear could lead the conservative-majority Supreme Court to weaken ...

Supreme Court rejects calls to put a hold on EPA power plant ...

In the ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, agreed with dismissing the requests to stay the rule, but said “the ...

Judicial Destruction of the Clean Water Act: Sackett v. EPA

As massive a cutback as the majority's ruling is on the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act, it is mere child's play in comparison to the interpretation of the ...

'Devastating' Supreme Court Decision Leaves Wetlands Unprotected

The case, Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, involved defining which water bodies that phrase applies to. Disagreement has prevailed ...

EPA | Clean Water Action

One year ago, on May 25, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Sackett v. EPA. This decision narrowed the scope of the Clean Water Act ...

The US Supreme Court just gutted the EPA's power to regulate ...

The decision could slow progress on America's climate goals. ... The Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate carbon dioxide and ...

The Supreme Court Gets Clean Water Supremely Wrong - NRDC

EPA, a case in which the operators of an excavation company, represented by an anti-regulatory law firm, sought to eliminate Clean Water Act ...

San Francisco is battling with itself over a Supreme Court appeal it ...

That's because the unusual case involving sewage discharges into the Pacific Ocean has put a city known for its uber-liberal politics in league ...

With Good Neighbor Rule ruling, it's the Supreme Court's world now ...

In a divided 5-4 vote, the court granted several applications for emergency stays, temporarily blocking the Environmental Protection Agency's ( ...

Supreme Court Strips Federal Government of Crucial Tool to Control ...

Supreme Court Limits E.P.A.'s Ability to Restrict Power Plant Emissions · 'No slack in the system': Ruling will make hitting climate targets more ...

Ohio v. EPA Threatens the EPA's Ability To Regulate Air Pollution ...

This case serves as another opportunity for this radical, right-wing Supreme Court to rule in favor of powerful industry polluters over the ...

What you need to know about the Supreme Court's EPA case

In a major blow to averting catastrophic climate change, the high court gutted the EPA's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from ...

21-454 Sackett v. EPA (05/25/2023) - Supreme Court

This case concerns a nagging question about the outer reaches of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the principal federal law regulating water pollution ...

5 things to know about San Francisco's Supreme Court fight against ...

In its first environmental case of the term, the Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday in a battle to push EPA to get more specific ...

Statement: Supreme Court ruling is devastating setback for clean ...

The Supreme Court issued a decision in Sackett v. EPA onThursday that removes federal protection for millions of acres of wetlands.

Blog | Clean Water Fund

EPA Contends with Devastating Supreme Court Decision that Puts All Water At Risk. August 30, 2023 | By Jennifer Peters. This week the Environmental Protection ...

In climate-change case, justices grapple with EPA's role ...

The Supreme Court then granted a request by Republican-led states and coal companies to review that ruling; meanwhile, the Biden administration ...

20-1530 West Virginia v. EPA (06/30/2022) - Supreme Court

The distinc- tion between mootness and standing matters, however, because the. Government bears the burden to establish that a once-live case ...