FTC v. Simplicity Pattern Co.
FTC v. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc. | 360 U.S. 55 (1959)
Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc. No. 406 Argued April 21, 1959 Decided June 8, 1959
Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Company, Inc. - Oyez
Petitioner: Federal Trade Commission. Respondent: Simplicity Pattern Company, Inc. Docket no. 406. Decided by: Warren Court.
Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co. - Quimbee
Simplicity gave the tissue patterns to the department stores on consignment, but the fabric stores had to pay cash for all pattern purchases. Simplicity also ...
F. T. C. v. SIMPLICITY PATTERN CO., 360 U.S. 55 (1959) | FindLaw
Congress intended to protect a merchant from competitive injury attributable to discriminatory prices on any or all goods sold in interstate commerce, whether ...
Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co. - Case Brief ...
The Supreme Court held that, given competition between two classes of customers, neither the absence of competitive injury nor the presence of "cost ...
Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc., a Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal ...
The examiner concluded that the practices denounced in Count II violate § 2(e). Simplicity appealed, but the Commission affirmed, adopting the findings, ...
U.S. Reports: F. T. C. v. Simplicity Pattern Co., 360 U.S. 55 (1959).
U.S. Reports: F. T. C. v. Simplicity Pattern Co., 360 U.S. 55 (1959). Names. Clark, Tom Campbell (Judge); Supreme Court of the United States (Author). Created ...
Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Company, Inc.
... Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc., a major manufacturer of dress patterns. The FTC charged that Simplicity engaged in discriminatory practices by providing ...
Robinson-Patman Confounded (Simplicity Pattern Co. v. FTC, D.C. ...
Simplicity Pattern Co., No. 6221, FTC, March 22, 1957. 17. Section 2(a) of the act provides: That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce ...
Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co ... - Case Law
SIMPLICITY PATTERN CO., Inc., Petitioner,. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Nos. 406, 447. Argued April 21, 1959. Decided June 8 ...
FTC V. SIMPLICITY PATTERN CO., INC., 360 U. S. 55 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court. FTC v. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc., 360 U.S. 55 (1959). Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc.
Uniform Enforcement of Anti-Discrimination in Trade Practices
The landmark case of Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc., decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 8, 1959, serves as a pivotal ...
Terminology Service: SST: FTC v. Simplicity Pattern Co.
... FTC v. Simplicity Pattern Co. Preferred term. FTC v. Simplicity Pattern Co. Broader concept. Supreme Court cases. Belongs to group. cases. Date. 1959. URI.
U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record F T C v. Simplicity Pattern ...
U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record F T C v. Simplicity Pattern Co - ISBN 10: 1270055437 - ISBN 13: 9781270055433 - Gale, U.S. Supreme Court Records ...
Robinson-Patman Confounded (Simplicity Pattern Co. v. FTC, D.C. ...
The Simplicity Pattern Case: Robinson-Patman Confounded (Simplicity Pattern Co. v. FTC, D.C. Cir., 1958) ; dc.date, 2021-11-25T13:36:11.000 ; dc.date.accessioned ...
House of Materials, Inc. v. Simplicity Pattern, 298 F.2d 867 - Casetext
55 (S.D.N.Y. 1961). The present dispute is the outgrowth of a decision by the Supreme Court in FTC v. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc., ...
The Robinson-Patman Act: Annual Update
v FTC, 440 U.S. at 80, quoting Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. FTC, 346 ... Simplicity Pattern Co., 360 U.S. 55, 62-63, the Supreme Court held that ...
The FTC Is Revitalizing Price Discrimination Enforcement - Dentons
V. Best Practices. Given increased FTC activity and bipartisan ... Simplicity Pattern Co., 360 U.S. 55, 65-68 (1959).↩; 15 U.S.C. §§ 13 ...
RPA Update: Different Channel but Same Competition? - Perkins Coie
[12] Innovation Ventures, 89 F.4th at1143 (quoting F.T.C. v. Simplicity Pattern Co., 360 U.S. 55, 59-60, 62 (1959). [13] Id ...
P.W. Husserl, Inc. v. Simplicity Pattern Co., 191 F. Supp. 55 - Casetext
2d 1079, in which the Supreme Court affirmed a cease and desist order of the Federal Trade Commission based upon findings that Simplicity, in violation of ...