How do we improve peer review?

How do we improve peer review? - Research Information

“One area that's commonly discussed is image integrity. Western blots are easy to manipulate in an unsophisticated way, and researchers or paper ...

What can we do to improve the peer review system?

78% think that peer review is still the best way to allocate research funds, although half of them think that it lacks transparency and objectivity.

How to Be A Good Peer Reviewer - The Scholarly Kitchen

How to Be A Good Peer Reviewer · Mind the Time · Be Intentional · Read the Guidelines and Scope · Educate and Grow Your Community · Say No (and ...

How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought

The landscape is shaped by four schools of thought: The Quality & Reproducibility school, the Democracy & Transparency school, the Equity & Inclusion school, ...

Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author ...

This opinion article discusses real-life information about the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer for scientific journals.

What makes a good or a bad peer review? Tips for excelling at ...

What does a good peer review look like? ... 1. Start with a (very) brief summary of the paper. This is a useful exercise for both reviewers and ...

6 ways to improve the peer review experience

A survey of seasoned peer reviewers identifies ways reviewers and the firms being reviewed can change for the better.

Improving the quality of Peer Review and accelerating the peer ...

The solution lies in having more and more good quality standard peer reviewed biomedical journals published from Pakistan.

How could the peer review system be improved? - Quora

A very simple thing that can be done to improve peer review is to publish the referee reports alongside the paper, including the entire ...

The 4 ways peer review is broken (and how to fix them)

How to improve the peer-review process · 1. Create incentives for peer review. · 2. Conduct fully blinded reviews. · 3. Publish manuscripts for ...

Improving peer review: What reviewers can do - Oxford Academic

This commentary provides guidance to reviewers on the best practices for conducting a peer review for biomedical journals.

A Beginner's Guide to the Peer Review System - Inside Higher Ed

If not, then reply to the journal editor promptly so they can find another reviewer. If you can think of someone who would be better to review ...

Top Tips for Peer Reviewers - Wiley Author Services

Top tips for peer reviewers · 1. Respond Promptly to Invitations · 2. Show Integrity · 3. Stay Within Scope · 4. Be Constructive · 5. Allocate Enough Time · 6. Be ...

Understanding peer review - Author Services - Taylor & Francis

Researchers consistently tell us that their final published article is better than the version they submitted before peer review. 91% of respondents to a Sense ...

How Can I Get the Most Out of Peer Review?

You can let students pick their own peer-review partners or group members, but you might also consider assigning peer reviewers based on your knowledge of ...

The peer review system is broken. We asked academics how to fix it

Many respondents also suggested journals can improve how they recruit reviewers, and what work they distribute. Expert reviewers could be ...

Understanding the peer review process: A step-by-step guide for ...

They assess the strengths and weaknesses of the study, identify any errors or gaps in the research, and provide constructive feedback to improve ...

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of ...

We aimed to perform a systematic review and a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of interventions to improve the ...

4 Ways to streamline journal peer review for a faster time to publication

At the core of an efficient peer review process is clear editorial policies and procedures. It's important for journals to not only include high ...

Improving peer review: What authors can do - Oxford Academic

The purpose of this commentary is to provide readers with an overview of the publication process, the potential outcomes to expect, how to handle rejection,