Hundreds in Oregon still await new trials a year after Supreme Court ...

Citing racist origins, justices struck down Oregon's law allowing such convictions, but the state isn't applying the ruling retroactively.

Oregon Supreme Court says people convicted by split juries ...

Oregon Supreme Court says people convicted by split juries deserve new trials · The ruling could mean hundreds of cases will be retried or ...

The Supreme Court outlawed split juries, but hundreds remain in ...

... Oregon to be convicted even if two jurors voted not guilty. Despite the ruling, some of them may never get a new trial.

Oregon Supreme Court finds hundreds convicted by nonunanimous ...

A Friday opinion by the Oregon Supreme Court offers clarity for people convicted in trials where not everyone on the jury agreed the ...

REVERSING A MAJOR INJUSTICE IN OREGON'S FLAWED TRIAL ...

While an 84% vote in support of retroactively addressing unconstitutional convictions is substantial, the small percentage of opposition ...

Oregon Supreme Court Rejects Hundreds of Convictions by ...

The Oregon Supreme Court ruled today that all prisoners convicted by nonunanimous juries must have their cases reconsidered.

Hundreds serving time in Oregon prisons eligible for new trial, state ...

The Oregon Supreme Court has ruled that people convicted by nonunanimous juries have the right to a new trial. Before the U.S. Supreme Court ...

Kaia Sand | Oregon should overturn all verdicts delivered by non ...

... Oregon's non-unanimous jury law that the U.S. Supreme Court ... Hundreds in Oregon still await new trials a year after Supreme Court ruled on non- ...

Jury still out on split-jury cases as hundreds seek new trials

Following the Supreme Court's Ramos ruling, in spring of 2021 the Oregon legislature wrote non-unanimous juries out of state law in Senate Bill ...

Oregon Supreme Court finds hundreds convicted by nonunanimous ...

Oregon Supreme Court finds hundreds convicted by nonunanimous juries deserve new trial ... Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes ...

Many Oregonians convicted by split juries left in limbo by new ...

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that people convicted in the past by nonunanimous juries shouldn't have their cases automatically ...

Oregon Supreme Court Orders New Trials for Hundreds Convicted ...

The Oregon Supreme Court ruled Friday that hundreds of people convicted by non-unanimous juries and still serving prison sentences in the state will be granted ...

Last year the U.S. Supreme Court ruled... - Christen McCurdy ...

Hundreds in Oregon still await new trials a year after Supreme Court ruled on non-unanimous juries. Citing racist origins, justices struck down Oregon's l...

Oregon needs to do more to ensure that everyone has access to ...

Despite recent public defense reforms, Oregonians still don't have access to justice as 3500 suspects face charges without an attorney.

Oregon's nonunanimous jury system struck down by U.S. Supreme ...

Oregon's decades-long practice of allowing split verdicts to convict felony defendants came to an end Monday when the U.S. Supreme Court ...

Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Non-Unanimous Acquittals in ...

In February, the Supreme Court of Oregon released an opinion that trial attorneys in the state have been eagerly awaiting since the Supreme Court's landmark ...

AG Rosenblum Statement on U.S. Supreme Court Ruling in ...

“We now have the guidance we have been waiting for from the U.S. Supreme Court (Edwards v. Vannoy decision). The Edwards case held that Ramos is ...

Hundreds of split jury cases getting second day in court across Oregon

In 2022, the Oregon ...

Oregon public defender asks court to withdraw overworked ...

For the last 15 months, Oregon's public defense system has failed to provide attorneys for hundreds of people charged with a crime, including ...

Oregon Convictions Are Thrown Into Doubt by the U.S. Supreme ...

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court reopened dozens of Oregon criminal cases that appeared decided. Justices handed down a ruling in Ramos v.