Events2Join

Ideker Farms v. United States


Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States

See. Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States, 142 Fed. Cl. 222 (2019). (Reconsideration Decision). The trial court denied the mo-.

Ideker Farms, Inc., et al. v. United States of America (NW Missouri ...

The lawsuit claims the Corps took the Plaintiffs' property for a public purpose without any just compensation, violating their Fifth Amendment rights.

Federal Circuit Affirms Missouri River Restoration is Per Se Taking ...

Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States, 151 Fed. Cl. 560, 567 (2020). However, the trial court determined that any crops destroyed were ...

Opinion Summary - Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States

The Federal Circuit reviewed a conclusion of the Court of Federal Claims that the government's action was the cause-in-fact of flooding damage.

Corps Of Engineers Loses Appeal In Missouri River Flood Case

The US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on June 16 against the Corps of Engineers in its three-year-old appeal of the Ideker Farms flood-damages case.

Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States - Fed Circuit Blog -

The CFC's judgment that the United States is liable for a taking of private property should be reversed on any of the following grounds.

Ideker Farms v. United States | Cato Institute

Ideker Farms v. United States. Under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, the federal and state governments must pay “just compensation” for ...

Court Recognizes Reliance Interest in Federal Flood Control Projects

v. United States, 71 F.4th 964, 980 (Fed. Cir. 2023); Court of Federal Claims – Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States, No. 14-183L, 2018 WL ...

Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States | U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Federal Circuit holds that plaintiffs suffered a compensable taking of their real and personal property by permanent, recurring flooding. The U.S. Chamber ...

21-1849: IDEKER FARMS, INC. v. US [OPINION], Precedential

Posted: IDEKER FARMS, INC. v. US [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-1849 Origin: CFC Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and ...

A Missouri River Court Decision Could Sink Hawaii's Ala Wai Flood ...

The Ideker decision found that farming interests along the Missouri River were entitled to damages after the Corps scaled back its flood ...

IDEKER FARMS, INC., et al v. USA, No. 1:2014cv00183 - Justia Law

IDEKER FARMS, INC., et al v. USA, No. 1:2014cv00183 - Document 691 (Fed. Cl. 2020) case opinion from the US Court of Federal Claims.

Federal Circuit Rules Temporary-but-Recurring Flooding of Property ...

In its recent decision in Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that temporary, but ...

21-1875 - Ideker Farms, Inc. v. US - Document in Context - - GovInfo

Bluebook · 21-1875 - Ideker Farms, Inc. v. US · Browse · About · Developers · Features · Help · Feedback. Submit Feedback ...

Farmers Win Shot at Crop Compensation in Missouri River Flooding

Ideker Farms Inc. and landowners from six states sued the government, alleging that the Army Corps of Engineers took their farmlands and ...

Site Pages: Home

Ideker Farms, Inc., et al. v. United States of America, Case No. 14-183L, is ... Trial on Phase 1 began in the federal courthouse in Kansas City ...

Ideker Farms, LLC v. United States

This case raises the question of how property owners and businesses along the Missouri River should be compensated in response to ...

Missouri River Basin landowners secure appellate victory for ...

Plaintiffs in the case, Ideker Farms, Inc., et al. v. United States of America, have been led by Am Law 100 firm Polsinelli and its shareholders ...

IDEKER FARMS, INC., et al v. USA, No. 1:2014cv00183 - Justia Law

3 was resumed after post-trial briefing1 on November 13, 2017 for eight days of closing arguments. During the 55 days of witness presentations, the court heard ...

Flooding and Federal Projects: Exposures and Limits to Liability

... Farms, Inc. v. United States, No. 11-275-L,. (Fed. Cl. Feb. 5, 2021). 114 Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States (Ideker I), 136 Fed. Cl. 654 ...