Is Wikipedia Reliable?

Wikipedia's reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s but has been improved; its English-language edition has been generally praised in the late 2010s ...

What's Wrong with Wikipedia? | Harvard Guide to Using Sources

The fact that Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic research doesn't mean that it's wrong to use basic reference materials when you're trying to ...

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source

Additionally, it is possible that some errors may never be fixed. It is also possible for an edit correcting an error to later be reverted. Therefore, Wikipedia ...

People who still think Wikipedia is some completely unreliable ...

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time ...

Students are told not to use Wikipedia for research. But it's a ...

Why is Wikipedia so reliable? ... Many teachers point out that anyone can edit a Wikipedia page, not just experts on the subject. But this doesn't ...

Wikipedia – Be Credible

In this chapter, we will explore the history of Wikipedia, what type of resource it is, whether or not it's reliable, when it is appropriate to use the source, ...

Is Wikipedia a credible source? - Paperpile

Wikipedia is not a credible source because it allows multiple users to edit, and it is not safe to assume that the facts presented there have been checked ...

How reliable is Wikipedia as a source of information, and why?

It is a very “democratic” source of information. The moderators do a very good job of keeping a lot of bias and unverified information out of ...

Wikipedia:Reliable sources

This page in a nutshell: Wikipedia requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations. If you are new to ...

Go ahead and use Wikipedia for research - The Boston Globe

Dismiss the online encyclopedia no longer. It may just be one of the most reliable sources on the internet.

Is Wikipedia a Reliable Source for Information?

The answer as to whether it is trustworthy is both yes and no. Sometimes, Wikipedia can be an accurate source of information.

Wikipedia: Why is the common knowledge resource still neglected ...

This is true even in many specialized topics, such as anatomy, biology, or medicine, where Wikipedia is as accurate as the professional sources ...

Is Wikipedia a good source? When to use the online encyclopedia

While timely updates are an advantage of Wikipedia, the impermanence of articles can make them difficult to rely on for information. Students ...

Is Wikipedia a Reliable Source?. Some say you should never quote it.

Wikipedia's accuracy is sometimes uneven. But I would hasten to add that it is pretty reliable in general.

Is Wikipedia a reliable source for academic research? - Scribbr

A credible source should pass the CRAAP test and follow these guidelines: The information should be up to date and current.

Meet Wikipedia's Reliable Sources List: Another Proxy For Google's ...

With Wikipedia's reliable sources list, you can quickly understand the score a site receives, view the discussions around that site's ...

Is Wikipedia Accurate? - Canisius University

The findings indicate that overall the [Wikipedia] articles are objective, clearly presented, reasonably accurate, and complete.

What Makes a Reliable Source for Wikipedia? - The Mather Group

Strong sources are an incredibly important part of this because they create verifiable citations, and the citations are what substantiate a page.

Is Wikipedia Reliable? - Wikimedia Community Ireland

Wikipedia makes no guarantee or claim to be a reliable source of information. It has no formal peer review and yes, anyone with a phone/computer ...

Wikipedia – an unreliable source - Cornell University

If it is widely believed that Wikipedia is an unreliable source because anyone can edit it, many other pages will steer clear from citing Wikipedia.