Is it really a dangerous practice to push changes to a software ...

Yes, arguably that's insanity :) Far too much risk as you functionality gets (invariably) more and more complex.

Is force pushing really bad practice? : r/git - Reddit

Force pushing on a feature branch to squash some things or clean up history is common practice and a good thing to keep history clean and ...

Is there a danger of using "git push --force" if I am working on a ...

However, once you trim the repo (or is trimmed automatically due to size/configuration) the things get really complicated and will require ...

Is it wrong to git push force branches?

Because changing your commit history can make things difficult for everyone else using the repository, it's considered bad practice to rebase ...

GitFlow considered harmful | End of Line Blog

... software to our production servers everytime there was a commit on master. ... Also, refactorings cannot ever change things - by definition ...

Is using Git for deploying a bad practice?

git makes it extremely easy to rollback the code deployed on production to a previous version if a security issue is raised. This can be helpful ...

Squash commits considered harmful - DEV Community

The parent fields don't really mean anything except for informational purposes, the tree the merge commit points to is what actually counts.

7 Git Mistakes a Developer Should Avoid | Tower Blog

1. Committing Large and Unrelated Changes Together · 2. Neglecting to Write Descriptive Commit Messages · 3. Ignoring .gitignore · 4. Not Cleaning Up Old Branches ...

A succesful Git branching model considered harmful

Using individual (long lived) branches for features also make it harder to ensure that everything works together when changes are merged back ...

Git Gud: Version Control Best Practices - Appsilon

Any developer can just go where the code is living, edit some stuff, click deploy, and the app's behavior will be changed in some way. Sounds ...

Matt's Tidbits #23 — Why to avoid force-pushing | by Matthew Groves

It's very likely that during the time it takes to make your changes, respond to feedback several times, fix broken tests, etc. that someone else ...

Is git commit --amend truly *important*? - DEV Community

My current workplace has a pretty strong and widespread practice of amending (or fixups). It helps immensely for reviews of slightly more ...

6 best practices for Git version control - Nulab

Let's start with the cornerstone of version control: incremental, small changes. It may sound elementary, but the impact of this simple practice ...

Commit Early, Push Often - Worklytics

Don't try to be a hero. It's a best practice in modern software development to break up your work into small pieces and frequently integrate it with the ...

Commit often, perfect later, publish once: Git best practices (2013)

One can do a lot more things in git. But then the disadvantage is that one actually gets to think about all of these 'a lot more things'. One ...

Coding Career Advice: Using Git for Version Control Effectively

... commit with just chose changes, and repeat the process for the next commit. ... Force pushing is semi-dangerous, depending on workflow. If ...

git rebase: what can go wrong? - Julia Evans

losing commit metadata; more difficult reverts; rebasing can break intermediate commits; accidentally run git commit –amend instead of git ...

What Makes a Good Git Commit? - Simple Thread

But just like formatting changes, it can greatly complicate things if you need to track down a bug later. Refactoring is technically meant ...

Commit Often, Perfect Later, Publish Once—Git Best Practices

As long as you have committed your work (or in many cases even added it with git add ) your work will not be lost for at least two weeks unless you really work ...

Merging vs. Rebasing | Atlassian Git Tutorial

... commit every time you need to incorporate upstream changes. ... This is like saying, “Oops, I didn't really want to push that original version of the feature ...