Is there any evidence that double blind peer review systems are ...

4 Answers 4 ... Yes, there is scientific research on this topic. Using data from ACM WSDM'17, A. Tomkins et al. showed that double blind reviewers ...

Double-blind Peer Review... What are the benefits and drawbacks?

If the authors' identity is unknown to the reviewer, it will prevent the reviewer from forming any bias. There are advantages and disadvantages ...

Double-Blind Reviews: A Step Toward Eliminating Unconscious Bias

These sentiments are supported by a study of 40,000 research paper authors in which double-blind review was considered the most effective form ...

Research Integrity and Peer Review - BioMed Central

According to a questionnaire sent to reviewers in a Danish study, 38% preferred a double-blind review system, 34% preferred a single-blind ...

A Case for Double-Blind Review - Academic Medicine

However, I was troubled by one portion of the discussion about double- versus single-blind peer review. The majority of the journal editors who spoke, including ...

Is Double-Blind Review Better? | American Physical Society

Double-blind peer review may strip a paper down to “just the science” — and may well be an effective and fairer option for some fields. It may even prove to ...

Why is the peer-review process not double-blind in certain science ...

Reviewers are professional and fair anyway, so double-blind isn't needed;; Reviewers will be able to tell who wrote the paper anyway, so it won' ...

Double blind peer reviews are fairer and more objective, say ... - NCBI

A large survey of academics from around the world has found strong support for the double blind system of peer review of research papers.

Why don't all disciplines follow a double-blind review system?

In fields with a vibrant pre-print culture (e.g. Physics or Math), most papers are already publicly posted on the internet with the authors ...

Peer review bias and double-blind reviewing: a new study

This study confirms that double-blind review cuts down on bias–but the main bias it cuts down on isn't any of the “usual suspects” that get ...

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review - PNAS

We present a controlled experiment in which four committee members review each paper. Two of these four reviewers are drawn from a pool of committee members ...

The Fiction of Double-Blind Reviewing: Evidence From the Social ...

The purpose of double-blind peer review is to hide non–paper-related signals (e.g., authors' affiliations) from an online manuscript system so that reviewers ...

Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?

An alternative approach is double-blind review, in which neither authors nor reviewers are aware of each others' identity. More recently, the approach of open ...

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor ...

There is substantial evidence that systemic biases influence the scholarly peer review process. Many scholars have advocated for ...

Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty ...

CONCLUSIONS: While the AJNR process of double-blind peer review minimizes reviewer bias, perceived knowledge of the author and institution is ...

Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author ...

Although 1 study found double-blind reviews to be of higher quality, others detected no differences. ... However, these studies were limited by ...

Double-Blind Peer Review: Pros, cons and everything in-between

Double-blind peer review is a process used by scholarly journals where the reviewer's identity is hidden from the authors and vice versa.

What is Double Blind Peer Review and How Does it Work?

It ensures that all publications meet the quality standards of the journal they are being submitted to. The double-blind peer review process is a way to ensure ...

Should peer-review be double-blind? - Claus O. Wilke

In summary, the positive and the negative aspects of double-blind review are about even, in my opinion. I have no major concerns about double- ...

vs single-blind peer review effect on acceptance rates: a systematic ...

The double-blind peer review process seemed to be associated with an 18% lower manuscript acceptance rate than the single-blind peer review process.