Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners of State of N.C.

Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners of State of N.C., 317 F. Supp. 1350

No one contends that James Keenan and Margaret Burnham, both of whom are licensed to practice in other states, fail to meet North Carolina's requirements as to ...

Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners, 317 F. Supp. 1350 (E.

P. 23. The class consisted of all prospective applicants for the North Carolina Bar Examination who had not yet been residents of the state ...

1970 Eastern District of North Carolina US Federal District Court ...

Shinall v. Worrell · December 18, 1970 · 319 F. Supp. 485 ; Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners of State of NC · October 2, 1970 · 317 F. Supp. 1350 ; Clayton v. North ...

Keenan v. Board of Bar Examiners —N.C. Bar Residence Case ...

From the Series: Files of cases brought before state and federal courts including litigation papers and correspondence, arranged by state and ...

Supreme Court of the United States - Public Citizen

Board of Law Examiners of the State of North Carolina;. Susan Freya Olive ... South Carolina); see Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners,. 317 F.Supp. 1350 ...

Morrison v. Board of Law Examiners - Casetext

In this case, Plaintiff, a citizen of North Carolina, seeks a comity admission to the North Carolina Bar. He has been denied the opportunity to practice law in ...

Constitutional Law -- Equal Protection and Residence Requirements

in Schware v. Bar Examiners" the court in Keenan pointed out that. [i]n licensing attorneys there is but one constitutionally permissible.

Steven C. Morrison vs Board of Law Examiners of the State of North ...

Shor. CHARLOTTE CHAPTER OF ASSOCIATION. OF CORPORATE COUNSEL. US LEC Corp. 6801 Morrison Boulevard. Charlotte, North Carolina 28211. (704) 319-6869. Counsel for ...

Golden v. State Bd. of Law Examiners, 452 F. Supp. 1082 (D. Md ...

... examination and gave the examination only once each year. Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners of State of North Carolina, 317 F. Supp. 1350 (E.D.N.C.1970). In ...

A projected Reversal of suffling v. Boudrant, 339 F. Supp. 257 (DNM ...

Board of Bar. Examiners"0; and the more stringent test announced in Shapiro v. Thompson' of proving a "compelling state interest" since the fundamental freedom ...

Table of Authorities for Ricci v. State Board of Law Examiners, 427 F ...

1 reference to Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners of State of NC, 317 F. Supp. 1350 (E.D.N.C. 1970) District Court, E.D. North Carolina Oct. 2, 1970 Also ...

State Departments, Institutions, and Agencies - NCDOJ

Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners, 317 F. Supp. 1350 (E.D.N.Y. 1970). The Judicial Standards Commission is a state body created by Article 30, ...

Residence Requirements for Initial Admisson to the Bar a ...

The court in Keenan concluded that the Board of Law Examiners' presumption that everyone who had resided in North Carolina for less than a year was unfit to ...

NCBA History - North Carolina Bar Association

Admission to the State Bar is the responsibility of the N.C. Board of Law Examiners. The late William M. Storey, who served as executive vice president and ...

Residency Rule for Admission to Bar Violates Privileges and ...

For cases where state bar residency rules have also been challenged under the equal protection clause see: Golden v. State Bd. of Law Examiners, 452 F. Supp.

KNOWLTON v. BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS OF TENNESSEE | Law

Ct. 752, 1 L.Ed.2d 796] case, the Supreme Court ruled that "A state cannot exclude a person from the practice of law or ...

KONIGSBERG v. STATE BAR, 366 U.S. 36 (1961) - FindLaw Caselaw

The Committee declined to certify him as qualified for admission to the Bar on the ground that his refusals to answer had obstructed a full investigation into ...

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of the State of New Mexico

...one has the right to practice their chosen profession free from arbitrary governmental interference. Schware v. Bd. of Bar Exam'rs., 353 U.S. 232 (1957). One ...

North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

The state-action antitrust immunity doctrine is premised on the idea that Congress, in passing the Sherman Act, could not have intended to ...

In the Supreme Court of the United States

MORRISON,. PETITIONER, v. BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS. OF NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL.,. RESPONDENTS. Counsel for Amicus Curiae.