LGBTQ Discrimination Cases at the Supreme Court

In Bostock v. Clayton County, the Supreme Court ruled that anti-LGBTQ discrimination violates the federal law against discrimination in the ...

LGBTQ+ Rights Supreme Court Cases

Discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity and expression may occur in many areas of life, such as employment, housing, or education.

Examples of Court Decisions Supporting Coverage of LGBT-Related ...

Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., 523 U.S. 75 (1998). The Supreme Court held that same-sex harassment is sex discrimination under Title VII. Justice Scalia ...

List of LGBTQ-related cases in the United States Supreme Court

The Court did not rule on the broader intersection of anti-discrimination ... Clayton County, a similar case of sexual orientation discrimination from the ...

Beyond Bostock: The Future of LGBTQ Civil Rights

On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark 6-3 decision affirming that the prohibition on sex discrimination in Title VII of the ...

Active Court Cases that Will Influence the State of LGBTQ+ Rights

In addition, anti-equality state attorneys general and anti-equality organizations are challenging non-discrimination rules issued by the ...

Court Cases - LGBTQ Rights - American Civil Liberties Union

... sex discrimination when it fired her because she's transgender. We represented Aimee Stephens in front of the U.S. Supreme Court — and won. Status: Closed ...

Supreme Court Delivers Major Victory To LGBTQ Employees - NPR

The Supreme Court says the federal ban on discrimination "based on sex" applies to gay, lesbian and transgender employees.

Supreme Court to Hear Heterosexual Woman's Reverse ...

The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear a case brought by a heterosexual woman who claimed discrimination based on her sexual orientation ...

Supreme Court limits LGBTQ protections with ruling in favor ... - CNN

Clayton County, the conservative justice wrote for the majority that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which bars discrimination “because of ...

What's at Stake in the Supreme Court's Next LGBTQ Case? - GLAD

That's discrimination. And what the Supreme Court is going to decide in this case is whether laws like these that deny something to people just ...

The Supreme Court case reshaping LGBTQ+ rights - PolitiFact

In 2020's Bostock v. Clayton County decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual ...

Momentous Supreme Court Decision Supports LGBTQ Rights | NEA

On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that LGBTQ employees — including all LGBTQ educators — are protected under federal law from discrimination at ...

9 Supreme Court Cases That Shaped LGBTQ Rights in America | TIME

The case revolved around an amendment to a Colorado law, which banned cities from passing anti-discrimination laws that would protect gay and ...

The Supreme Court Allows Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

The Supreme Court Allows Discrimination Against LGBTQ People · After 20 years of expanding gay rights, the justices swing back. · Related · We ...

17-1618 Bostock v. Clayton County (06/15/2020) - Supreme Court

In cases involving discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, the grounds for the em- ployer's decision—that individuals ...

Civil Rights Law Protects L.G.B.T. Workers, Supreme Court Rules

But even as the Supreme Court established that right in 2015, workplace discrimination remained lawful in most of the country. An employee who ...

Man who won gay rights case at Supreme Court agrees to settlement

... case was one of three that led to a 2020 Supreme Court ruling that said civil rights law protects LGBTQ people from workplace discrimination.

The Supreme Court made an ominous turn against LGBTQ ... - Vox

Bostock v. Clayton County, briefly explained ... Bostock held that a federal anti-discrimination law that bans “sex” discrimination in the ...

A beginner's guide and brief history of LGBTQ rights cases ... - GLAAD

Explicitly, Title VII protects employees from discrimination of race, color, national origin, sex, and religion. In the past, the Supreme Court ...