Landmark Supreme Court Decisions Restrain Federal ...

Supreme Court Landmarks | United States Courts

Holding: States cannot nullify decisions of the federal courts. Several government officials in southern states, including the governor and legislature of ...

Landmark United States Supreme Court Cases

Issue: Does the Constitution prohibit laws that severely restrict or deny a woman's access to abortion? Result: Yes. The Court concluded that such laws violate ...

Landmark Supreme Court Cases | Brennan Center for Justice

Taney declared that Scott — along with all others of African descent, enslaved or free — was not a U.S. citizen and therefore lacked the right ...

Marbury v. Madison (1803) - National Archives

With his decision in Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review, an important addition to the ...

Landmark Supreme Court Decisions and Their Impact on Public Policy

The Heller decision significantly impacted gun control policy, curtailing states' and cities' ability to restrict handgun access. Many handgun ...

Powers of Congress Supreme Court Cases

Congressional action compelling state officers to execute federal laws is unconstitutional. The federal government's power would be augmented immeasurably and ...

Supreme Court Decision Limiting the Authority of Federal Agencies ...

On June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a longstanding legal precedent that required federal courts to defer to reasonable ...

List of landmark court decisions in the United States - Wikipedia

United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876) The Second Amendment has no purpose other than to restrict the powers of the federal government. · Presser v.

Legal | Buckley v. Valeo - FEC

On January 30, 1976, the Supreme Court issued a per curiam opinion in Buckley v. Valeo, the landmark case involving the constitutionality of the Federal ...

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) - National Archives

In this ruling, the US Supreme Court stated that enslaved people were not citizens of the United States and, therefore, could not expect any protection from ...

Due Process Supreme Court Cases

An undue burden exists, and therefore a provision of law is invalid, if its purpose or effect is to place substantial obstacles in the path of a woman seeking ...

Twenty-Five Landmark Cases in Supreme Court History

Although the First Amendment ensures a free press, until this case, it only protected the press from federal laws, not state laws. Minnesota shut down J. M. ...

Prior Restraint Cases - Free Speech Center

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2022 in Houston Community College System v. ... First Amendment claim regarding retaliation for his criticisms of the board.

The Court and Constitutional Interpretation - Supreme Court

The Constitution limits the Court to dealing with "Cases" and "Controversies." John Jay, the first Chief Justice, clarified this restraint early in the Court's ...

Judicial Restraint | Definition, Cases & Examples - Lesson - Study.com

Board of Education (1954) struck down racial segregation in schools. Another example is Roe v. Wade (1973) when the Supreme Court created the constitutional ...

The legal principle behind a more restrained Supreme Court term

Standing doctrine, per the U.S. Constitution, limits federal court jurisdiction to certain “cases” and “controversies.” Why We Wrote This. A ...

The Slaughter-House Cases (1873) - The National Constitution Center

The Supreme Court's decision in The Slaughter-House Cases was its first major decision interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment.

Facts and Case Summary - Morse v. Frederick | United States Courts

Fraser (1986) in which the Supreme Court ruled that students do not have a First Amendment right to make provocatively obscene speeches at school; and Hazelwood ...

Judicial restraint | Definition, History, & Facts - Britannica

U.S. Supreme Court decisions as early as Fletcher v. Peck (1810) state that judges should strike down laws only if they “feel a clear and strong ...

5 Historic Supreme Court Rulings Based on the 14th Amendment

That argument derives from the substantive due process clause: that neither federal nor state governments can restrict fundamental decisions ...