Events2Join

Moral Vegetarianism


Moral Vegetarianism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Moral vegetarianism is the view that it is morally wrong—henceforth, “wrong”—to eat meat. The topic of this entry is moral vegetarianism and the ...

Ethics of eating meat - Wikipedia

People who abstain from eating meat are generally known as "vegetarians". They avoid meat for various reasons such as taste preference, animal welfare, ethical ...

Is there a good moral argument against vegetarianism? - Reddit

The argument that sways me the most is the moral argument, that there is no distinction between animal and human life and its immoral to cause suffering when ...

Vegetarianism - Northern Illinois University

ethical vegetarianism and the moral status of animals. Keywords. Vegetarianism; Animal ethics; Moral status;. Environmentalism; Hunger; Food security;. Global ...

Is vegetarianism truly morally superior? - Quora

Vegetarianism is clearly and undeniably a more morally justifiable position. (At least if "deniability" can only be achieved through logic.).

A CRITIQUE OF MORAL VEGETARIANISM - Reason Papers

What seems to be absent in some recent vegetarian arguments; however, is any consideration of animals. (Arguments for the new moral vegetarianism will be ...

The Ethics of Vegetarianism: An Interview with Peter Singer

I think being largely vegan is certainly the right thing to do. It means that you're not complicit in various forms of animal suffering.

2 Strict Vegetarianism Is Immoral - Oxford Academic

The most popular and convincing arguments for the claim that vegetarianism is morally obligatory focus on the extensive, unnecessary harm done to animals and ...

Moral Vegetarianism from a Very Broad Basis

By contrast, traditional human-centered ethical theories (e.g., Kantian ethics, contract theory) attribute no moral status to animals while the status quo of ...

The ethical arguments against eating meat | University of Oxford

... ethical arguments for giving up meat. In a guest post, Julian Savulescu, the Uehiro Professor of Practical Ethics at Oxford, says that ...

Why some philosophers think you should be a vegetarian

The moral arguments behind vegetarianism are ancient, numerous, and well reasoned. · They tend to focus on the actions behind meat production.

Moral vegetarianism vs. Moral omnivorism - De Gruyter

This paper is interested in the positions that might be called “moral vegetarianism” and “moral omnivorism” (“vegetarianism” and “omnivorism” from now on).

Dialogues on Ethical Vegetarianism - Digital Commons @ Cal Poly

Michael Huemer. University of Colorado. Page 2. Michael Huemer. 21 http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/. Vol. 22, Issue 1. The ethical case for vegetarianism ...

Five Ethical Reasons for Vegetarianism

Ethical vegetarians call for reducing or omitting meat from the human diet on several grounds such as loss of animal lives, link of livestock farming with ...

Why the Naïve Argument against Moral Vegetarianism Really is Naïve

I argue that his defence fails. KEYWORDS. Vegetarianism, naive argument. INTRODUCTION. Moral vegetarians think that it is morally wrong ...

Are vegetarianism and veganism about animal welfare or moral ...

The truth is that an ethically carnivorous life is possible so long as we ensure the animals we consume have lived and died without unnecessary suffering.

Ethical Vegetarianism - What it is and Why It's What I Call Myself

An ethical vegetarian is someone that chooses a vegetarian diet based on moral reasoning. As an ethical vegetarian, I believe that eating or ...

Moral vegetarianism - Tyler Doggett - PhilPapers

Moral vegetarianism · Abstract · Author's Profile · Categories · Keywords · Reprint years · Other Versions · Links. PhilArchive. This entry is not archived by ...

Intro to Philosophy 3: Moral Vegetarianism - YouTube

Lecture on Stephen Law's Philosophy File 1 (Should I eat meat?) and Mylan Engel's "Vegetarianism". Apologies for crappy sound - it was ...

What are good arguments against the moral case for vegetarianism?

There is a strong utilitarian case for a pragmatic type of vegetarianism, based on the idea that eating meat usually causes suffering.