Mozilla Public License
About the License. Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source/free software license. The current version of the license is ...
Mozilla Public License, version 2.0
2.1. Grants Each Contributor hereby grants You a world-wide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license. 2.2. Effective Date The licenses granted in Section 2.1 with ...
Mozilla Public License - Wikipedia
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source weak copyleft license for most Mozilla Foundation software such as Firefox and Thunderbird. ... The MPL ...
Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0
The MPL 2.0 is neither a permissive license like the MIT License (which allows for use of the licensed code with very few restrictions) nor a ...
This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the ...
Pros and Cons of using MPL-2.0 license?
The MPL license is a copyleft license, which means that in principle people are not allowed to distribute code that is under the MPL-2.0 license ...
Licensing question: Mozilla Public License 2.0 : r/opensource - Reddit
It's a "modern" license with protections against patent disputes like the Apache 2.0, but unlike the Apache 2.0 license it's not incompatible with the GPLv2.
Opinions on the Mozilla Public License v2.0 for Rust code? - Reddit
It's a "modern" license with protections against patent disputes like the Apache 2.0, but unlike the Apache 2.0 license it's not incompatible with the GPLv2.
Mozilla Public License version 1.1
The Initial Developer hereby grants You a world-wide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license, subject to third party intellectual property claims.
Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL), About - The FreeBSD Forums
Like BSD Clear, MPL and Apache 2.0 Licenses keep clear separation of their code from code with more restrictive licenses. Code under BSD, ISCL, ...
Mozilla Public License, version 1.0 - Open Source Initiative
The Initial Developer hereby grants You a world-wide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license, subject to third party intellectual property claims.
Licensing: MIT/Apache-2 vs. MPL-2.0 - community - Rust Users Forum
The TL;DR of it is that people tend to use MIT OR APACHE-2.0 because the compiler and std are licensed under MIT OR APACHE-2.0.
Mozilla Public License 2.0 | Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX)
Standard License Header. This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this ...
MPL (Mozilla Public License) Open Source license in a nutshell
The Mozilla Public License Version 2.0, or just MPL, is one of the popular Open Source licenses. Let's take a quick look on what MPL allows, ...
Why Copyleft Mozilla Public License is my favorite • - N=1 Lifestyle
I optimize that in my own projects by choosing the copyleft Mozilla Public License (MPL) as my go-to open source license. In this post I detail my thoughts ...
Mozilla Public License | Encyclopedia MDPI
It grants liberal copyright and patent licenses allowing for free use, modification, distribution, and "exploit[ation]" of the work, but does ...
Mozilla Public License 1.0 | Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX)
The Initial Developer hereby grants You a world-wide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license, subject to third party intellectual property claims.
The MPL-2.0 License Explained: Pros, Cons, and Use Cases
Weak copyleft license balancing open source principles and commercial use. Allows mixing with proprietary code.
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) - rosenlaw
The resulting Mozilla Public License (the. MPL), has been the model for most of the important commer- cial open source licenses that followed. Next to the BSD ...
Why my open-source code uses the Mozilla Public License
What type of license is the Mozilla Public License? The Mozilla Public License (abbreviated as the MPL) is a middle ground between permissive ...