Events2Join

No poach agreements


No-Poach Agreements | Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky LLP

No-poach agreements between competitors in a market are designed to limit employee options, and ultimately result in reduced employee compensation.

No poach agreements: What's the big deal? | Publications - Linklaters

There has been a global shift in approach to foreign investment. Authorities are taking a far closer look at proposed What are “no poach agreements” and why ...

No-Poach Agreements & Anticompetitive Behavior

A no-poach agreement is an illegal deal between competitors where they agree not to hire, recruit, or pursue each other's employees. Anticompetitive agreements ...

How Major Tech Firms Used Illegal “No-Poach” Agreements to ...

The 2005–2009 “no-poach” agreements among Silicon Valley technology firms—and the ensuing U.S. Department of Justice. (DOJ) investigation that ended the ...

What is a no-poaching agreement, and why is it illegal?

What's crucial to know – and to make sure the appropriate people in your company know – is that no-poaching agreements are illegal. Specifically ...

No-Poach Agreements Receive Their Marching Orders in the US ...

This alert considers the recent legal developments that HR should be aware of and the key do's and don'ts.

Antipoaching - Wikipedia

Antipoaching (or no-poach agreement) is an anti-competitive conduct where companies conspire not to hire each other's employees. Antipoaching agreements ...

As U.S. Department of Justice Suffers Setbacks, New York ...

A no-poach agreement is an agreement between or among employers not to solicit, recruit, or hire another's employees.

No-poach Agreements: Increasingly Risky - California Lawyers ...

This article surveys the recent focusing of the enforcement agencies' attention on no-poach agreements and provides a set of recommendations for employers to ...

No Poach Agreements: Legality and Implications | Hamilton Law Firm

Are No Poach Agreements legal? A non-poaching agreement is a legal restrictive covenant that an employee may be asked to sign at the start or ...

Non-Solicitation and No-Poach Agreements | Practical Law - Westlaw

A Practice Note discussing key antitrust issues relating to non-solicitation agreements, also known as no-poach or no-hire agreements.

DOJ Continues to Prioritize No-Poach Cases | Jenner & Block LLP

A “no-poach” is a tacit or express agreement between employers not to hire or solicit employees from one another. This type of agreement may be lawful under the ...

No-poach agreements – Closing the enforcement gap - WilmerHale

DaVita Inc., a no-poach agreement in the dialysis sector—resulted in acquittals on the antitrust charges. Despite these developments, the DOJ.

No-poach agreements can comply with competition – when they are ...

No-poach agreements are typically contrary to competition law. However, no-poach commitments may be part of a broader legitimate collaboration agreement.

Franchise No-Poach Clauses Under Scrutiny - The Temple 10-Q

These “no-poach” or “anti-poaching” clauses are standard provisions that restrict franchisees from soliciting or hiring employees of the franchisor or another ...

AG Platkin: No-Poach Agreements Are Presumptively Illegal

For Further Information: ... TRENTON – Attorney General Matthew J. ... No-poach agreements between companies restrict the rights of workers to move ...

NLRB Regional Director Targets No-Poach Agreements in Latest ...

On September 12, 2024, the Regional Director for Region 22 (Newark) filed a complaint against Planned Companies, a building maintenance and ...

NLRB Issues Complaint Alleging Business-to ... - Management Memo

alleging that employee non-hire (or “no poach”) provisions in the company's contracts with its building clients violate the National Labor

Seventh Circuit: No-Poach Agreements May Be Per Se Illegal

A recent Seventh Circuit opinion by Judge Easterbrook held that no-poach agreements, absent valid ancillary restraints, can be per se ...

DOJ Jettisons Its Last Criminal No-Poach Prosecution, but Antitrust ...

DaVita, where a Colorado federal judge ruled that the government's “no-poach” allegation was a type of horizontal market allocation, and thus ...