- 16|1454 Ohio v. American Express Co. 🔍
- Ohio v. American Express Co.🔍
- Ohio v. American Express:The Exception That Should Not Become a ...🔍
- How Epic v. Apple Operationalizes Ohio v. Amex🔍
- Market Definition and Anticompetitive Effects in Ohio v. American ...🔍
- Platforms and the Rule of Reason🔍
- OHIO V. AMERICAN EXPRESS🔍
- Why the Supreme Court's decision in Ohio v. AmEx will fatten the ...🔍
Ohio v. American Express
16-1454 Ohio v. American Express Co. (06/25/2018) - Supreme Court
OHIO ET AL. v. AMERICAN EXPRESS CO. ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No ...
Ohio v. American Express Co. | Oyez
A case in which the Court held, under the “rule of reason,” that the government's showing that American Express's anti-steering provisions stifled price ...
Ohio v. American Express Co. - SCOTUSblog
Holding: American Express' anti-steering provisions in its merchant contracts—which prohibit merchants from avoiding fees by discouraging customers' American ...
Ohio v. American Express Co. - Wikipedia
The Court issued its decision on June 25, 2018, affirming the Appeals Court's ruling that steering provisions do not violate antitrust laws. With this decision ...
Ohio v. American Express:The Exception That Should Not Become a ...
Our view is that any expansion of Amex would threaten basic prin- ciples upon which effective antitrust enforcement is built, including that (i) market ...
Ohio v. American Express Co.: The Supreme Court addresses anti ...
Anti-steering” is the practice by which a credit card company prohibits a merchant from encouraging consumer cardholders to use another credit card ...
Ohio v. American Express Co. - Quimbee
The United States and several states (plaintiffs) sued Amex, claiming that its antisteering provision violated antitrust laws. The trial court found that credit ...
How Epic v. Apple Operationalizes Ohio v. Amex
The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Ohio v. American Express (Amex) remains central to the enforcement of antitrust laws involving ...
Market Definition and Anticompetitive Effects in Ohio v. American ...
American Express Co.,1 which addresses the proper antitrust treatment of two-sided platforms, may be one of the most significant market- ...
Platforms and the Rule of Reason: The American Express Case
In Ohio v. American Express Co., the Supreme Court applied antitrust's rule of reason to a two-sided platform. The challenge was to an “anti ...
That task has been made more difficult with the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ohio v. American Express Co. (“Amex”).2 Moving forward, one ...
Why the Supreme Court's decision in Ohio v. AmEx will fatten the ...
The Supreme Court's 5 to 4 decision to side with American Express over Ohio, sixteen other states, and the United States, further ensconced our ...
Supreme Court Sides With American Express on Merchant Fees
Eleven states asked the Supreme Court to hear the case, Ohio v. American Express, No. 16-1454, saying that the appeals court's decision was ...
Ohio v American Express | Journal of Antitrust Enforcement
The case concerned the legality of American Express's use of 'anti-steering provisions'. The provisions are contractual rules meant to prevent ...
How Epic v. Apple Operationalizes Ohio v. Amex
While both the district court and the Ninth Circuit largely ruled in favor of Apple over Epic, these decisions are of broader interest for their ...
"Rebuilding Platform Antitrust: Moving on from Ohio v. American ...
Now that the immediate fallout from the Supreme Court's blockbuster Amex decision has cooled, this Article aims to give a first draft of its place in ...
Implications for Non-Transaction Multisided Platforms
Ohio v. American Express: Implications for Non-Transaction Multisided Platforms · Author(s): Joshua Wright, John Yun · Posted: 12-2018 · Law & Economics #: 18-50 ...
OHIO v. AMERICAN EXPRESS CO. | Supreme Court | US Law
The antisteering provision prohibits merchants from discouraging customers from using their Amex card after they have already entered the store ...
"Ohio v. American Express: Misunderstanding Two-Sided ...
In Ohio v. American Express Co., the United States Supreme Court had its first knowing encounter with what it incorrectly viewed as a two-sided platform in ...
Ohio v. American Express - Ballotpedia
The outcome: On a vote of 5 - 4, the Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the Second Circuit, holding that American Express' antisteering provisions did not ...