- What's Wrong with Paying for Peer Review?🔍
- Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?🔍
- The $450 question🔍
- Why aren't we get paid to review papers? 🔍
- Who pays the price for peer review?🔍
- What are pros and cons for paid peer review? [closed]🔍
- Can someone get paid as a peer reviewer for scientific journals ...🔍
- How Much Do Peer Reviewers Get Paid?🔍
Peer Reviewers Should Be Paid
What's Wrong with Paying for Peer Review? - The Scholarly Kitchen
Only peer reviews which are published openly are paid for, including the price. So, everybody can judge if the peer review in question is worth ...
Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?
Paying for reviews could increase the pool of reviewers, particularly reaching researchers who cannot afford to work for free. Payment could ...
The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers? - Science
The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers? Payment advocates expect quicker, better reviews but opponents fear unsustainable costs.
Why aren't we get paid to review papers? : r/postdoc - Reddit
The issue is not that reviewers should be paid, but instead, journals should be open access. The fees for accessing publications is exploitive ...
Who pays the price for peer review? - Morressier
The debate around paid peer review is not a new one. In 2020, a researcher named James Heathers began the 450 movement, stating that $450 is an ...
What are pros and cons for paid peer review? [closed]
Remember that you will need 2-3 reviewers per paper, and you will need to pay them even if the article is rejected. It's not uncommon for ...
Can someone get paid as a peer reviewer for scientific journals ...
Direct to the point, Journals do not pay anything to the peer reviewers. Researchers may get a small token of appreciation for reviewing books ...
How Much Do Peer Reviewers Get Paid? - Reviewer Credits
It's a critical, indispensable step in the publication cycle, yet peer reviewers typically get paid nothing. Not a cent, euro, or yen. BUT… There are a few ...
Amid high profits and falling wages, peer reviewers must be paid
The prospect of remunerating reviewers for their time and expertise has ignited fervent debate, with strong arguments for and against it.
Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix ...
The proponent of this idea argues that peer review should be considered as a business transaction, where a modest remuneration per paper of ...
Should a Peer Reviewer Be Paid? - Enago Academy
Critics argue that payments to peer reviewers would simply be passed on in higher subscription fees or article processing charges, but all that ...
No to paid peer review - The Lancet
Peer review can last months or years in some cases. Paying peer reviewers can speed up the process and motivate reviewers to evaluate manuscripts more ...
It is not work that is assigned or expected by one's employer, and you would get paid exactly the same salary by forgoing being a reviewer. Or a ...
Is It Time to Pay Peer Reviewers? - The Chronicle of Higher Education
The usual wisdom is that scholars should review more than they write. If every article needs two to three peer reviewers, an author should ...
Should journals pay for peer review work? - ResearchGate
A reflection on receiving payment for peer review work in journals that charge authors with APC costs or charge readers for downloading.
Is paid peer review a good idea? | Editage Insights
They are, instead, rewarded non-financially by means of acknowledgment in journals, positions on editorial boards, free journal access, ...
Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix ...
To make the payment of professional reviewers sustainable, it might be suggested to levy a submission fee of $200 per submitted paper. This fee should only be ...
Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers? - PubMed
Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?
Should journals pay for manuscript reviews? | Small Pond Science
I definitely don't think paying peer reviewers solves any of the major problems with the system, and could potentially create more problems. I ...
If there is ever going to be a time peer reviewers will be paid for their ...
Paying for reviews could increase the pool of reviewers, particularly reaching researchers who cannot afford to work for free. Payment could ...