Rattagan v. Uber Techs.

Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Justia Law

Dana Corp. The court concluded that Robinson provided only a narrow exception to the economic loss rule, which did not apply to Rattagan's ...

Commercial Parties, Transactional Lawyers and Litigators Beware

The California Supreme Court's recent decision in Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. makes it easier for California litigants to sue for ...

Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, S272113. - GMSR Appellate Lawyers

The question presented is: Under California law, are claims for fraudulent concealment exempted from the economic loss rule?

No. S272113 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA ...

RATTAGAN,. Petitioner, vs. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,. Respondent. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH ...

RATTAGAN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC (2021) - FindLaw Caselaw

This case therefore turns on Mr. Rattagan's remaining argument: fraudulent concealment claims are exempt from California's economic loss rule.

Rattagan v. Uber: California Court on Fraudulent Concealment

The California Supreme Court rules in Rattagan v. Uber, allowing fraudulent concealment claims during contracts if harm exceeds original ...

Rattagan v. Uber Techs., Inc., 19 F.4th 1188, 1189 (9th Cir. 2021)

Rattagan challenged the district court's decision arguing that fraudulent concealment claims are exempt from California's economic loss rule.

California Supreme Court clarifies economic loss rule

In a matter of first impression, the California Supreme Court in Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. recently answered a question previously ...

Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (2024) 17 Cal.5th 1 - Los Angeles

Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (2024) 17 Cal.5th 1. Courts have split over whether a plaintiff can assert a tort claim for fraudulent ...

Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Daily Journal

Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives, Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our Verdicts and Settlements.

Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. 8/22/24 SC - California Courts

S272113 August 22, 2024. Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. 8/22/24 SC. Supreme Court Published Opinion.

Economic loss rule does not categorically bar all fraudulent ...

In Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. the Supreme Court resolved a question certified by the Ninth Circuit involving the application of ...

Discovery sanctions, economic loss rule opinions filing tomorrow

The Supreme Court will file its opinions in Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. and City of Los Angeles v. PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Rattagan v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Casetext

Plaintiff Michael Rattagan alleges that he was retained by Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. to help it prepare to launch operations in Buenos ...

Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. 8/22/24 SC Case Details

Supreme Court of California 08/22/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 08/22/2024 11:04 Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. 8/22/24 SC Case Details

Rattagan (Michael R.) v. Uber Techs. | No. S272113 | Cal. - CaseMine

Rattagan (Michael R.) v. Uber Techs. ... The request, made pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law ...

Blame Games & Automobiles: Rattagan v. Uber Technologies and ...

As a result, Argentinian authorities raided his office, leaving him subject to potentially significant liability under Argentinian law.

Rattagan v. Uber Techs., Case No. 19-cv-01988-EMC - Casetext

Rattagan deleted that allegation and worded the FAC so as to imply a direct relationship with Uber Technologies." Id. The Court granted Uber ...

Atty's Argentine Uber Debut Fight Lands At Calif. High Court - Law360

Rattagan alleges Uber fraudulently concealed information from him when he represented their subsidiaries during a problem-filled launch in ...

Rattagan v. Uber Technologies - Case Portal

Rattagan v. Uber Technologies. Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card ...