Events2Join

Research Guidelines/Board of Reviewers


Research Guidelines/Board of Reviewers - College Media Review

CMR Board of Reviewers · Bob Bergland, Northwest Missouri Western State · Kay Colley, Texas Wesleyan University · Vince Filak, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh ...

COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers

It is hoped they will provide helpful guidance to researchers, be a reference for journals and editors in guiding their reviewers, and act as an educational ...

Guidelines for Reviewers | Research - Science Partner Journals

Guidelines for Reviewers · Be objective. If a reviewer cannot judge a paper impartially, they should not accept the invitation to review it. · Provide considerate ...

Institutional Review Boards Frequently Asked Questions - FDA

Under FDA regulations, an IRB is an appropriately constituted group that has been formally designated to review and monitor biomedical research involving human ...

Reviewer Guidelines - Research Involvement and Engagement

Peer review is a process used to assess the validity, significance and originality of research before publication in a scientific journal.

Guidelines For Peer Reviewers

The anonymity of reviewers ensures an objective and unbiased assessment of the manuscript by the reviewers. Publishers recommend that reviewers review COPE ...

How to find peer reviewers - an editor's guide

1. Check the references in the article · 2. Use search tools and databases to find researchers working on similar topics · 3. Use your editorial board · 4.

Reviewer Guidelines - Wiley Online Library

Reviewers should not involve anyone else in the review of a manuscript (including early career researchers they are mentoring), without first obtaining ...

Instructions to reviewers - Intestinal Research

The use of reporting guideline is recommended for review. Reviewers should have no conflict of interest. Reviewers should point out relevant published work ...

Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers | COPE

Find out the principles and standards to which all peer reviewers should work to during the peer review process in research publication.

Institutional Review Board - Toolkit

Federal regulations require that research projects involving human subjects, including clinical trials, be reviewed by an IRB, but you may not be aware of the ...

Peer-Reviewer Guidelines | Peertechz Publications

The peer-review process and the recommendations of expert reviewers assists the Editor-in-Chief or designated member of the Editorial Board to recommend ...

Reviewer and Editor Guidelines

Reviewers may be chosen by an editor. The editorial board may provide recommendations for reviewers if asked to do so. Normally, three reviewers will be ...

Guidelines for editors and reviewers - Business Perspectives

The Editorial Board consists of international experts in their fields. All members of the Board occupy the positions in educational and research institutions.

Guidelines for Reviewers - Journal of Laboratory and Precision ...

1. Peer review mode · 2. Transparent peer review · 3. The role of reviewers · 4. Recognition for reviewers · 5. To become a reviewer · 6. Guidance ...

TRB Annual Meeting Committee Reviewer Guidelines

If the paper was submitted for publication, you will be asked to provide a 1-10 recommendation to go to the Editorial Board for further review; The decision ...

Guide to referees | Scientific Reports - Nature

Editorial decisions are made by our Editorial Board of active researchers who manage the peer review process and decide which manuscripts should be published.

Guidelines For Article Reviewers - F1000Research

Reviewers are chosen using our reviewer criteria, ensuring that the people invited are experts in their field of research. If a paper includes statistical ...

Peer-Review Process - Baishideng Publishing Group

If Editorial Board Members and Peer Reviewers are interested in the research content of a manuscript after reading the title, abstract, and ...

2.3 Reviewer Roles and Responsibilities - Council of Science Editors

Peer review is the principal mechanism by which the quality of research is judged. Most funding decisions in science and the academic advancement of ...