- Guidelines for Reviewers🔍
- How to Become a Peer Reviewer🔍
- Reviewing papers for MDPI🔍
- Do you accept to review for MDPI? 🔍
- Peer Reviewed Articles 🔍
- My experience as a reviewer for MDPI🔍
- Why are the peer|reviewing processes at the MDPI publisher so fast ...🔍
- What is your experience as reviewer of MDPI and Applied Sciences ...🔍
Reviewing papers for MDPI
Guidelines for Reviewers - MDPI
Peer review is an essential part of the publication process and it ensures that MDPI maintains the highest quality standards for its published papers. All ...
How to Become a Peer Reviewer - MDPI Blog
MDPI journals are actively looking for volunteers to review manuscripts. If you are interested in reviewing for an MDPI journal, you can create ...
Reviewing papers for MDPI: general feeling as a reviewer
Reviewing experience is the best way to judge if MDPI is reputable, so this is about whether MDPI is reputable.
Do you accept to review for MDPI? : r/AskAcademia - Reddit
I frequently get emails to review articles from MDPI journals and, after frustrations with the short timeline to submit reviews and the poor ...
Peer Reviewed Articles : The MDPI Editorial Process
MDPI operates a rigorous and transparent peer review process that aims to maximize quality; it is handled by researchers and scholars.
My experience as a reviewer for MDPI - BishopBlog
I ended up recommending rejection of the paper two days after accepting to review. My biggest gripes were that the authors claimed that data ...
Why are the peer-reviewing processes at the MDPI publisher so fast ...
MDPI has much shorter default times for review. A typical MDPI journal might ask for reviews to be turned around in 10 working days.
What is your experience as reviewer of MDPI and Applied Sciences ...
Most of us are invited to review papers for various journals. Most often the deadline is quite reasonable for doing a proper review.
4 Steps to the Perfect Peer Review Report - MDPI Blog
General concept comments about peer review reports ... For articles, elements that should be noted include the weaker aspects of the paper, the ...
I'm gonna ask whether publishing in MDPI journals is good or more ...
MDPI has opted to debunk the unnecessary delays prominent with journal publications. Their systems and review process is very agile and the ...
A Critical Assessment of the Peer Review Process in Life
Even now, thousands of papers are retracted yearly due to plagiarism and scientific misconduct. At MDPI, this issue is not an issue because the ...
Reviewing Your Manuscript Q&A - MDPI Blog
We answer some of the most frequently asked questions about the review stage below. Make sure to leave a comment if your question isn't answered here!
Q: What is the reputation of MDPI as an academic publisher? - Editage
They seem to have an efficient peer review system in place and are transparent about their article processing fees. This makes me inclined to ...
Information for Authors - MDPI
publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts of high scholarly impact · maintain quick publication—manuscripts are published within 5–7 weeks of submission ( ...
Another MDPI post with a classic reviewer 2: I want to share my ...
... MDPI journals. To be ... journals and all five papers I had a very good review comments. I ...
MDPI Editorial and Peer-review Process - YouTube
Comments4 · Editing: Things they don't tell you about what journal editors want · Preprints and Other MDPI Initiatives · The Peer Review Process ...
Since 2018, MDPI journals also operate an open peer-review option, meaning that the authors have the option to publish the review reports and ...
Suspicious phrases in peer reviews point to referees gaming the ...
So far, it found 32 papers require postpublication re-review and 37 met quality standards. MDPI also said it contacted the 10 reviewers who had ...
Guest Post - Reputation and Publication Volume at MDPI and Frontiers
“Frontiers has published just over 464,000 articles (all article types) since 2007: 20% are classified as “review”, “opinion”, “mini review” or ...
Just got rejected from an MDPI journal, after two rounds of reviews
I got rejected by them last year. The review was actually quite helpful. The problem with them is with the variability of their quality.