Reviewing with the Royal Society

Are you interested in peer reviewing for the Royal Society journals? You need to be qualified at least PhD level (or equivalent) in a relevant subject.

Information for reviewers | Royal Society Open Science - Journals

Royal Society Open Science operates open peer review on all manuscripts. At all points in the peer review process we encourage referees to waive their ...

Information for reviewers | Proceedings of the Royal Society B

Reviewers play a critical role in ensuring the quality and integrity of published research. By reviewing for a Royal Society journal you are actively ...

Peer review, editorial standards and processes | Royal Society

Peer review systems. Most papers submitted to Royal Society research journals are peer reviewed in a single-anonymized fashion (author names are not concealed, ...

Understand how peer review works | Royal Society

Science is underpinned by the support and expertise of peer reviewers who contribute to the quality and progression of science. Our peer reviewers are experts ...

Peer reviewer support and resources - The Royal Society of Chemistry

Peer review upholds science as a force for good ... Your role as a reviewer matters. The process of assessing manuscripts is crucial in making sure that the ...

Reviewer rewards - Royal Society

To help recognise the vital contribution our reviewers make to the publishing process and to lower barriers to open access publication, we've introduced a ...

Reviewer responsibilities - The Royal Society of Chemistry

have one or more recent publications in peer-reviewed journals of comparable impact and reputation to our journals. Benefits of being a reviewer for our ...

Royal Society releases hundreds of historic peer-review reports to ...

Among the newly released reports is a review by the Nobel prize-winning crystallographer Dorothy Hodgkin of one of Francis Crick and James ...

Are you co-reviewing? - Royal Society

Recognising co-review. It is important to recognise the work of co-reviewers. At the Society it is done in two ways. 1. When completing the ...

This video outlines 7 Royal Society peer review processes that ...

This video outlines 7 Royal Society peer review processes that support research integrity. By reviewing for the Royal Society journals you ...

The early days of peer review: five insights from historical reports

A crop of referee reports from the Royal Society's archive reveal discussions about cutting printing costs, reviewer holidays and even editing images.

Writing a review—the do's and don'ts | Royal Society

Dr Maurine Neiman discusses the value of peer review and highlights the different elements to consider when writing a review report.

What is the reputation of the Proceedings of the Royal Society A in ...

Proceedings of the Royal Soc (A) is a venerable and extremely reputable journal. It has a broad reach and some of the seminal work in the ...

A few pointers for a good review | Royal Society

Proceedings B senior editor Professor Sarah Brosnan from the Georgia State University shares her thoughts and experiences on what makes a good, constructive ...

Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals ...

Abstract. This article examines the evolution of peer review and the modern editorial processes of scholarly journals by analyzing a novel data ...

Relevance of joining the Royal Society of Medicine? : r/AskAcademia

So far, I didn't know so much about this “Society”, except maybe picturing it as an “old prestigious scholar society from the UK”, for people ...

Benefits for authors | Royal Society

Most Royal Society journals are normally peer reviewed in a single-anonymized fashion (author names are not concealed, but referee names are), while Notes and ...

GTV via peer review, Royal Society - Immigrationboards.com

Re: GTV via peer review, Royal Society ... CV, Personal statement and Recommendation could be enough, but you must understand the peer review ...

GLobal talent visa Endorsement review (Royal society) - Reddit

Hi everyone, I got rejected for global talent endorsement yesterday and I do not agree with the feedback. They questioned my future research ...