Events2Join

Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co.


Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co., 29 P.3d 887 - Casetext

The supreme court rejects the notion that gas is marketable as a matter of law, and that transportation costs are deductible from royalty payments as a matter ...

Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co. - Justia Law

The verdicts upon which the judgment was based found that that natural gas which was sold by defendants at the wellhead was marketable at that point, but that ...

ROGERS III v. WESTERMAN FARM COMPANY JG FMP MTS (2001)

First, the trial court determined that the leases were silent regarding allocation of costs, and therefore, no testimony or evidence should be presented to the ...

Deciding to Tolerate Ambiguity: Rogers v. Westerman - HeinOnline

Westerman Farm Co.,9 which have begun to show the words may mean nothing. In Rogers, the. Colorado Supreme Court took the unprecedented step of saying that the ...

Oil & (and) Gas Law: Royalty Valuation: Rogers v. Westerman ...

In Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co.,' the court created new law regarding transportation costs in gas lease royalty valuation. The court invoked the ...

„Rogers v. Westerman Farm Company“ von Colorado Court of ...

In this case, defendant, Mark Lowe Luther, served a sentence of incarceration for reckless manslaughter, was released on parole, and then violated his ...

Rogers v. Westerman Farm Company - Daily Journal

Rogers v. Westerman Farm Company. Lessees of oil and gas interests may deduct certain post-production costs before making royalty payments. To continue ...

"Oil & Gas Law" by Adam Marshall

Oil & (and) Gas Law: Royalty Valuation: Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co.: Burdening Lessees with an Implied Duty to Deliver Gas to a Marketable Location. Authors.

Rogers v. Westerman Farm Company on Apple Books

In this case, defendant, Mark Lowe Luther, served a sentence of incarceration for reckless manslaughter, was released on parole, and then violated his ...

Westerman v. Rogers :: 1999 :: Colorado Court of Appeals Decisions

H.G. WESTERMAN, Carl A. Westerman, and Loyle P. Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. James P. ROGERS, Desmond D. Brophy, Joseph ...

WESTERMAN v. ROGERS III (1999) - FindLaw Caselaw

Colorado Court of Appeals,Div. V. H.G. WESTERMAN, Carl A. Westerman, and Loyle P. Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. James P. ROGERS, Desmond D. Brophy, ...

Oil & Gas Litigation - Welborn Sullivan Meck and Tooley, P.C.

... Colorado Supreme Court remanded for new trial. Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co., 986 P.2d 967 (Colo. App. 1998), rev'd and remanded 29 P.3d 887. Represented oil ...

Supreme Court of Colorado August 2001 cases - Casetext

Supreme Court of Colorado August 2001 cases. People v. Koelsch · Stevens v. People · People v. Garcia · Young v. People · Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co.

PREAMENDED - Colorado

Legislatively reverses the Colorado supreme court decision in the case of Rogers v. Westerman Farm Company, 29 P.3d 887 (Colo. 2001). For purposes of oil ...

“Royalty-Valuation Disputes Under the Marketable Product Rule: Its ...

... Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co., 29 P.3d 887, 906 (Colo. 2001), an elaboration on marketable quality and on market location is necessary. This ...

Post Production Costs with XTO - Mineral Rights Forum

In Colorado if the lease is silent - as mine is - regarding post production expenses then they can't be deducted, see Rogers v. Westerman Farm ...

Contra Proferentem in the Oilpatch? The “Against the Lessee” Rule ...

E.g., Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co., 29 P.3d 887, 901 (Colo. 2001);. Garman v. Conoco, Inc., 886 P.2d 652, 659 (Colo. 1994); Gilmore v.

Natural Gas Producer, K.P. Kauffman Company, Inc., Wins First ...

... Colorado Supreme Court's opinion in Rogers v. Westerman Farm Company, which dramatically altered state law on royalty calculation. Rogers ...

Case 1:13-cv-00909-WJ-GJF Document 177 Filed 02/25 ... - GovInfo

Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co., 29 P.3d at 906. Because the Tatum lease does contain a provision regarding the free use of fuel, this issue is more properly ...

2023 CO 58

Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, Colorado, v ... ”5 Relying on our decision in Rogers v. Westerman. Farm Co., 29 P.3d ...