Scanner vs. DSLR for archiving prints
Scanner vs. DSLR for archiving prints: Beginners Questions Forum
Making the scans/photos themselves is quicker with the camera. However, total time is about the same either way. That's because the scanner has ...
DSLR vs Flatbed print scanning : r/AnalogCommunity - Reddit
It has the potential to be a lot faster since the captures are instant, but there's also more room for error in the physical process like ...
Digitisation: Should I use a flatbed scanner or a DSLR camera? - Blog
It takes me only a minute to digitise each glass plate negative (including removing the glass plate from its box and sleeve, capturing it, ...
Dslr vs Scan (and which one) - Negative Lab Pro forums
Resolution wise, you get much better quality from negatives with a film dedicated scanner. As I'm archiving family photographs, i use a film ...
Epson Flatbed Scanning VS DSLR Camera Scanning
It's not to say I wasn't able to get some decent scans and prints from these scanners, but the amount of time in physically scanning along with ...
In both cases. Try benchmarking Canon 5D MK II (or III) + Makro Planar (whatever focus length that was) against a Hasselblad film scanner. If ...
Film digitization - DSLR or scanner? Silvergrain Classics
DSLR scans will never quite reach this level in terms of color and overall image quality, but automatic color balancing can correct for color casts introduced ...
Personally I do save the files of negs that I scan, which takes up more space on my hard drive/cd's/dvd's than the RAW files from my DSLR.
Thread: Use a scanner or a DSLR to scan slides and negs
If for historically archiving national treasures, then dedicated film scanning is appropriate. This is labor intensive, as you will need to ...
Scanning or re-photographing? Best solution: SilverFast and CCD ...
Results vary depending on device and image. However, these results cannot be compared to those of a proper film scanner with CCD. With a CMOS scanner, there ...
DSLR Scanner: Scans and Comparisons [Archive]
Most dSLRs are under 20mp. But I can scan 4x5 film at far more pixels than the current crop of typical dSLRs can afford. c) Dust removal. Even ...
Photography vs. Scanning: Which is Best for You? - Chica Prints
Scanning is a great option if you're an artist who works with fine or unusual materials. You can use a professional (DSLR) camera to capture fine details in ...
COMPARING FILM SCANS // Lab vs DSLR vs Flatbed - YouTube
Do I still feel the same after all those years of scanning? Let me know what your thoughts are about these different methods and what your ...
Scanning without a Scanner: Digitizing Your Film with a DSLR - B&H
Incorporating a common process that photo labs have been using for years, as well as nearly any kind of printing production process, a scanner ...
Comparing Film Scans: Drum vs Flatbed vs DSLR - YouTube
That day may come one day, but until then, I'm perfectly happy with digital c-type prints and digital pigment prints. There's a lot to cover ...
Scanning Film: Options for Archiving and Analog Photographers
If you want to scan yourself, there are many varieties and tiers of film scanners. Are quick scans of prints from a photo album all you're ...
Epson Perfection V600 Photo Scanner vs dslr scanning quality - Flickr
For 35mm, most DSLRs can deliver scan quality exceeding that of a flatbed scanner. However, if you factor in time and convenience, a dedicated film scanner will ...
Questions about Camera Scanning a large archive
get all items into reach · review items and sort for Scan or NoScan · assemble batches · scan batches or have them scanned (lots of helpful info ...
In general, a scanner will do a better job than a digital camera or smartphone camera. If you have a lot of old photos to digitize, a scanner is the best ...
Digitizing old photos flatbed scanner or dslr? ... Which DSLR macro setup to buy for scanning negatives? ... Batch scanning of family archive: speed ...