Sears v. Sears
Sears v. Sears :: 1981 :: Supreme Court of Illinois Decisions
2d 412. There this court held that a second post-judgment motion, filed more than 30 days after judgment but within 30 days of the denial of the first motion, ...
Sears v. Sears, 166 A.2d 748 | Casetext Search + Citator
In an extensive and thoughtful memorandum the trial court reviewed the authorities and concluded that the defenses of estoppel and laches should not preclude ...
Sears v. Sears, 479 P.3d 767 | Casetext Search + Citator
[¶1] Kelsey N. Sears (Mother) appeals from portions of her divorce decree. She argues the district court abused its discretion by establishing ...
Sears v. Sears :: 1960 :: North Carolina Supreme Court Decisions
The doctrine of recrimination is recognized in North Carolina. It is well settled that the defendant to an action for divorce may set up as a defense in bar ...
Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n v. Sears Roebuck and Co
"The defendant had, over time, proffered several reasons for its failure to hire the plaintiff, including the selection of someone else, a lack of ...
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
The EEOC based its case entirely on statistical evidence tending to show that Sears employed more men in higher-paying, commission-based sales jobs, while women ...
Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Stiffel Company - Oyez
376 US 225 (1964) Argued Jan 16, 1964 Decided Mar 9, 1964 Sort: Unanimous decision for Sears, Roebuck & Company majority opinion by Hugo L. Black.
The Sears Case - James P. Scanlan, Attorney at Law
EEOC v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. is likely the largest employment discrimination ever fully tried. It was tried in the United States District Court for the ...
Final Judgment: U.S. v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, et al.
JUDGMENT. This cauee having come on for a hearing before the Court upon a motionby the plaintiff for a summaryjudgment against the defendants. Sears ...
APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS EEOC DISABILITY SUIT AGAINST ...
The Court of Appeals overturned that judgment in 2000 (See EEOC & Keane v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 233 F.3d 432 - 7th Cir. 2000), and sent the case ...
U.S. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc. - Case Law - vLex
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Court, U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit ...
NLRB v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., 421 U.S. 132 (1975) | FindLaw
The probability that an agency employee will be inhibited from freely advising a decisionmaker for fear that his advice, if adopted, will become public is ...
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. - Wikipedia
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. ... Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case that limited state law on ...
Reed v. Sears, Roebuck & Co | Case Brief for Law Students
Reed v. Sears, Roebuck & Co Case Brief - Rule of Law: The sealed container defense applies to products liability claims alleging “defective design or ...
Streb v. Sears Roebuck Company - Case Brief Summary for Law ...
In the case of Streb v. Sears Roebuck Company, the plaintiffs, including a minor who suffered injuries, filed a lawsuit against Sears Roebuck and Company.
SEARS v. SEARS (1999) - FindLaw Caselaw
Case opinion for NY Supreme Court, Appellate Division SEARS v. SEARS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. - Quimbee
Any charge that an employer has committed an “unfair labor practice” must originate with a complaint filed with the General Counsel of the National Labor ...
Nigro v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 784 F.3d. 495 (9th Cir. 2015)
Nigro v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 784 F.3d. 495 (9th Cir. 2015). Employee presented a triable issue of fact sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgement ...
SEARS, ROEBUCK TO PAY $6.2 MILLION FOR DISABILITY BIAS
... v. Sears Roebuck & Co., N.D. Ill. No. 04 C 7282. Today's decree is dated September 29, 2009. The court will hold a final hearing, currently ...
National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Company - Oyez
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board. Respondent: Sears, Roebuck & Company. Docket no.: 73-1233. Decided by: Burger Court.