Should peer|review be double|blind?

Double-blind Peer Review... What are the benefits and drawbacks?

If the authors' identity is unknown to the reviewer, it will prevent the reviewer from forming any bias. There are advantages and disadvantages ...

Single-Blind Vs. Double-Blind Peer Review - Enago Academy

On the other hand, only 50% of papers received rejection under single-blind peer review. The difference could be due to reviewers assuming that ...

Is there any evidence that double blind peer review systems are ...

Yes, there is scientific research on this topic. Using data from ACM WSDM'17, A. Tomkins et al. showed that double blind reviewers are less ...

Why is the review process not double blinded, and then unblinded ...

It sounds like you want to know who was rude to you during the review process, and the whole point is that this will never be revealed to the ...

Is Double-Blind Review Better? | American Physical Society

So the CSWP suggested that double-blind review should be the standard. But, according to Brown, the editors felt that trying to hide every single author ...

Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of ... - PubMed

The authors hypothesized that double-blinded review will not improve review quality and will not affect recommendation or rating. Methods: Traditionally ...

Shouldn't the peer review process be double-blinded? - ResearchGate

The peer review process can even be made TRIPLE-BLIND, where the reviewer also should not be revealed to the editorial board. This will nullify ...

Research Integrity and Peer Review - BioMed Central

In double-blind peer review neither authors nor reviewers know the identity of the others. Double-blinding should reduce the status bias and ...

What is the difference between a double blind peer-review process ...

In a double-blind reviewing process, both the authors and reviewers are anonymous to each other. Here are a few ways to tell if a journal uses a ...

Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review | CW Authors

In single-blind peer review, only the reviewers are anonymous. Reviewers know the authors' names and backgrounds, but authors don't know those of the reviewers.

Why is the peer-review process not double-blind in certain science ...

Reviewers are professional and fair anyway, so double-blind isn't needed;; Reviewers will be able to tell who wrote the paper anyway, so it won' ...

Why Is Double-Blind Peer Review Bad for Publishing? - Enago

Advocates believe this double anonymity makes for more candid and unbiased reviews: the reviewer will only consider the merit of the paper ...

Peer review: Single blind vs double blind - Ex Ordo

For example, reviewers could use the fact that they are anonymous as an opportunity to be unusually critical of authors. For example, a survey ...

Types of Peer Review - AJE

Double-blind peer review is a process used by academic journals to ensure articles submitted for publication are fairly reviewed by experts in ...

Double-Blind Peer Review: Pros, cons and everything in-between

Double-blind peer review is a process used by scholarly ... Authors should ensure their manuscript, and not just the title page ...

Types of Peer Review - Wiley Author Services

... reviewer will expend on assessing it. . Double and triple anonymized review. In double-anonymized peer review the reviewers don't know the identity of ...

The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer Review in Journals

It's easier for a journal to offer double-blind peer review than to make themselves vulnerable to serious scrutiny. And it has become a sign of ...

Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty ...

Many scientific journals use double-blind peer review to minimize potential reviewer bias concerning publication recommendations. However, because ...

Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?

Single-blind peer review could mean that reviewers familiar with the authors' field might be aware of undisclosed industry ties (Tomkins ...

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review - PNAS

Peer review may be “single-blind,” in which reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of paper authors, or “double-blind,” in which this information is ...